Calculating EMF and Internal Resistance of a Battery in a Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electromotive force (e.m.f) and internal resistance of a battery in a circuit with two 2.0 ohm resistors. The user initially calculated the effective parallel resistance as 1.0 ohms and set up simultaneous equations to find the e.m.f and internal resistance. After some confusion with isolating variables, they correctly simplified the equations to find that the internal resistance is 1 ohm. Ultimately, the user determined that the e.m.f of the battery is 6 volts. The problem was resolved with collaborative assistance from others in the thread.
Couperin
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
The question is:

A battery drives a current of 3.0 A round a circuit consisting of two 2.0 ohms resistors in parallel. When these resistors are connected in series, the current changes to 1.2A. Calculate:

a) the e.m.f of the battery

and

b) the internal resistance of the battery.


Here's how far I've got:

I calculated the effective parallel resistance to 1.0 ohms by doing

R=(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2})^-1

The potential difference in each case is 3V and 4.8V

So I've put them in a simultaneous equation:

Let E be the e.m.f, and r be the internal resistance:

E = 3r + 3
E = 1.2r + 4.8

Which can be written as

3r + 3 = 1.2r + 4.8

But I can't figure out how to isolate the r values!

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you get that far it's just a question of getting your rs on one side and your numbers on the toher...but I don't get teh same equations. Apologies - I've mixed up my series and paralle - it should be exactly as you said.

3r + 3 = 1.2r + 4.8

So

3r - 1.2r = 4.8 - 3

then subs back to find E
 
Last edited:
Aha! Why on Earth didn't I think of that... :(

Anyway, I got the answer now! Thanks!

3r - 1.2r = 4.8 -3
1.8r = 1.8
r=1

So EMF = 6 and internal resistance = 1

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top