Calculating Emitted Photon Properties for Excited Atoms | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldspice1212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating properties of emitted photons from excited atoms, specifically addressing the frequency, wavelength, energy uncertainty, and relative widths of spectral lines. The excited state energy is given as 1.8 eV, and the atom remains excited for 2.0 ms. Key equations include those for frequency and wavelength, with initial calculations yielding a frequency of approximately 4.35 x 10^14 Hz and a wavelength of about 6.9 x 10^-7 m. There is some confusion regarding the uncertainty in energy and the correct application of formulas for relative widths, but corrections are made, leading to a revised energy uncertainty of approximately 1.66 x 10^-31 J. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying derivatives and understanding the relationships between the variables involved.
oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Atoms of a certain material are in an excited state 1.8eV above the ground state and remains in that excited state for 2.0ms before to the ground state. Find
1) The frequency of the emitted photon
2) The wavelength of the emitted photon
3)The uncertainty in the energy of the emitted photon
4) The relative width of the special line \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \lambda } and \frac{ \Delta f }{ f } produced by these atoms.
I'm not really sure what 2.0 ms means, is that 2 milliseconds?

Homework Equations


Well, I'm not entirely sure, this what I mostly need help with but I'll try my best in finding what equations I think should be used.
1.f = \frac{ E }{ h }

2.\lambda=\frac{ c }{ f }

3. \Delta t \Delta E \ge \frac{ h}{ 2 }

4.\Delta \lambda = \lambda \frac{ \Delta E }{ E } not exactly sure for this one.

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so using equation 1. f = \frac{ E }{ h } = \frac{ 2.88*10^{-19}J }{ 6.626*10^{-34} Js } = 4.35*10^14 Hz

2. \lambda=\frac{ c }{ f } = \frac{ 3*10^8m/s }{ 4.35*10^14 Hz } = 6.9*10^-7m

3. \Delta t \Delta E \ge \frac{ h}{ 2 } = \Delta E = \frac{ h }{ \Delta t 2 } = \frac{ 6.626*10^{-34}Js }{ 0.002s(2) } = 2.66 *10^-31 J

4. I'm not sure if my formula I gave for this one is correct, but I'll try it anyways and not sure for frequency?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So, does the stuff I did above look right? I'm still having trouble with #4, as I'm still not sure what to do for it.
 
Start from ##d\lambda/dE##, and then replace the differentials by deltas.
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
Is that for the last question, by the way does the rest look right?
 
oldspice1212 said:
Is that for the last question, by the way does the rest look right?
Yes, it's for the uncertainty. Your answers 1 and 2 are correct, but for 3 the approach is correct by the numerical result is not.
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
Ah ok, I just did number 3 again and got 1.66*10^-31J.

4. \frac{ d \lambda }{ d E } => \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \Delta E }=\frac{ \lambda }{ E } => \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \lambda } = \frac{\Delta E }{ E }

But what exactly would delta lambda, and E be?
 
oldspice1212 said:
Ah ok, I just did number 3 again and got 1.66*10^-31J.
That looks right.

oldspice1212 said:
4. \frac{ d \lambda }{ d E } => \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \Delta E }=\frac{ \lambda }{ E } => \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \lambda } = \frac{\Delta E }{ E }
The first equality there is not correct. Start by writing ##\lambda## as a function of ##E##, then calculate its derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
Oh so would it be

\lambda= c/f=> \frac{ hc }{ E }

\frac{ d \lambda}{ d E} \frac{ hc }{ E} =>-\frac{ hc }{ E^2 }

But I don't understand how this helps me get delta lambda/lambda and delta frequency/frequency?
 
Now you have
$$
\frac{d \lambda}{dE} = - \frac{hc}{E^2} \Rightarrow \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\Delta E} = \frac{hc}{E^2}
$$
You simply need to use that to find ##\Delta \lambda/\lambda## in terms of ##\Delta E## and ##E##.
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
  • #10
Yes, I remember you said this earlier and it hit me before bed haha :p
Just wondering why is it positive now?To find \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \lambda } I first solve for delta lambda

\Delta \lambda = \frac{ hc \Delta E }{ E^2 }

For \frac{ \Delta f }{ f } if I find it in terms of lambda I get the inverse so \frac{ f }{ \Delta f }
 
Last edited:
  • #11
After I solve for delta lambda I can get \frac{ \Delta \lambda }{ \lambda } I wouldn't really need the \frac{ \Delta E }{ E } right? I can just use what numbers I find for the lambdas.
But I still have the frequency question as above, if I solve it in terms of lambda I get f/ delta f.
I just realized 3 is wrong it should be h bar, a little difference, where then h bar is 1.055*10^-34 Js and I get a weird answer of 2.6*10^-32 J
 
Last edited:
Back
Top