Calculating energies for a nuclear reaction?

tomsthename
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I was doing physics homework today, and wound up spending a couple hours on wikipedia, browsing through topics far out of my league- particularly nuclear physics. I'm left with an aching question that I hope someone here can help me out with.

In a nuclear reaction that requires a certain energy to occur, how do you determine what this energy is? Can it be done mathematically or is it purely experimental? For example, in this reaction (don't worry I'm not a wannabe alchemist... just an example that stuck out in my mind)
Mercury 198 + 6.8MeV gamma ray => neutron + Mercury 197

How can you tell that the gamma ray energy needs to be 6.8MeV?

Thanks in advance. Hope to stick around here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomsthename said:
So I was doing physics homework today, and wound up spending a couple hours on wikipedia, browsing through topics far out of my league- particularly nuclear physics. I'm left with an aching question that I hope someone here can help me out with.

In a nuclear reaction that requires a certain energy to occur, how do you determine what this energy is? Can it be done mathematically or is it purely experimental? For example, in this reaction (don't worry I'm not a wannabe alchemist... just an example that stuck out in my mind)
Mercury 198 + 6.8MeV gamma ray => neutron + Mercury 197

How can you tell that the gamma ray energy needs to be 6.8MeV?

Thanks in advance. Hope to stick around here.
Start with E=mc2. The masses of Hg198, Hg197, and neutron are all known. The mass difference (Hg197 + n - Hg198) converted into energy gives the energy of the gamma ray.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top