Calculating Energy Eigenvalues & Eigenfunctions for a 2D Particle

Franco
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
let's say..

there is a particle, with mass m, in a 2-dimensions x-y plane. in a region
0 < x < 3L ; 0 < y < 2L

how to calculate the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the particle?

thx :smile:

and.. 2nd question..

there is a particle of kinetic energy E is incident from the left on the potential barrier, height U, situated at the origin. The barrier is infinitely wide and E>U.

how to get an expression for the reflection coefficient R of the particle, as a function of the ratio ε= E/U
and how would the sketch look like?


:cry: i don't really know how to work them out...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, you are talking about a "potential well" in which the energy is taken to be 0 inside the rectangle, infinite outside. You need to solve Schrodinger's equation with Energy 0 inside the rectangle. This turns out to be one of the few situations where it can be solved exactly. The solution consists of "standing waves" (just like waves on a rubber rectangular sheet fixed at the boundaries).
 
i don't understand when it comes into 2 dimension :(
 
can someone help me see if these look right?

π = pi

0 < x < 3L ; 0 < y < 2L
E1 + E2 = E
Eigenvalue :
ψ(x,y) = A sin [(n1 π x) / (3 L)] sin [(n2 π y) / (2 L)]
Eigenfunction :
E = E1 + E2 = [(n1^2 π^2 ħ^2) / (6 m L^2)] + [(n2^2 π^2 ħ^2) / (4 m L^2)]
E = [(π^2 ħ^2) / (2 m L^2)] * [(n1^2 / 3) + (n2^2 / 2)]

for the 3 lowest energy
E11 = [(π^2 ħ^2) / (2 m L^2)] * [(1^2 / 3) + (1^2 / 2)]
= (5 π^2 ħ^2) / (12 m L^2)
E12 = [(π^2 ħ^2) / (2 m L^2)] * [(1^2 / 3) + (2^2 / 2)]
= (7 π^2 ħ^2) / (6 m L^2)
E21 = [(π^2 ħ^2) / (2 m L^2)] * [(2^2 / 3) + (1^2 / 2)]
= (11 π^2 ħ^2) / (12 m L^2)
 
Franco said:
and.. 2nd question..

there is a particle of kinetic energy E is incident from the left on the potential barrier, height U, situated at the origin. The barrier is infinitely wide and E>U.

how to get an expression for the reflection coefficient R of the particle, as a function of the ratio ε= E/U
and how would the sketch look like?


:cry: i don't really know how to work them out...

http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/qm1/modules/m2/step.htm

Nor do I, but here's a jumping point if it'll help. . . my brain doesn't work after 1:00am EST :biggrin:
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top