Calculating Energy of a 701nm Photon

  • Thread starter Thread starter leah0084
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Photon
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy of a photon with a wavelength of 701 nm, the formula E = hc/λ is used, where h is Planck's constant and c is the speed of light. The wavelength must be converted to meters, resulting in 701e-9 m. The calculated energy is initially found to be 2.83e-19 J, but it is important to include units in the final answer. The key correction noted is that the energy should be expressed as a negative value because the photon is emitted. The final correct answer is -2.84e-19 J.
leah0084
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An excited atom emits a photon of red light with a wavelength of 701. nm, what is the energy of the photon?----> _________________J


Homework Equations



and for this, my application was

firstly get landa from formula of c=landa * nu

and then landa * h, which is Planck's constant which is 6.626e-34.

since my wavelength is 701 nm, it can be 701e-9 in order to change to meter format.

so my final application would be {(2.998e8m/s)/(701e-9m)} * ( 6.626e-34J*s)= 2.83e-19 (after rounding up to get significant figures which is 3 digits from 701nm)



The Attempt at a Solution



2.83e-19
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Units! 2.83e-19 even if it's correct numerically is still wrong. You *need* to always have units.

2. Stay in symbols! Write down E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}, then just substitute in the numbers, after conversion to correct units.

(Btw, it's "lambda" not "landa")
 
i did put J (unit) at the end as well and it kept telling me wrong. did i do any conversion wrong?
 
oh, i got it.
the answer needed to be negetive because the question says "emits". so answer had to be negative. i replaced the answer with -2.84e-19 and it was correct. thank you for the help. now i can go to bed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top