Calculating equilibrium constants Keq

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the concentration of Cl2 gas in a chemical equilibrium involving iron and chlorine. The equilibrium constant (Keq) is provided as 53.25, but participants express confusion about how to derive the concentration of Cl2 from this information. It is clarified that without additional data, such as the volume of the container, it is impossible to calculate the moles or concentration of Cl2 accurately. The focus remains on the need for more information to solve the problem effectively. Overall, the thread emphasizes the limitations of the given data in determining the desired concentration.
Dave1212
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2Fe(s) + 3Cl2(g) ⇔ 2FeCl3(s)[/B]
Keq = 53.25 [CL2(g)] = ?M
Answer = [0.2658M]

Homework Equations


Keq = (cC)(dD)/(aA)(bB)

The Attempt at a Solution



Keq = [Cl2]3

53.25 = (Cl2)3

I’m confused because I feel like I need more to work with in this question. It seems like I need another number and I don’t know where to start on it.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to calculate? Thread subject says "calculating equilibrium constants" yet Keq is given.
 
Borek said:
What are you trying to calculate? Thread subject says "calculating equilibrium constants" yet Keq is given.

Trying to calculate the Moles for Cl2
 
Not enough information. Can you quote entire question?
 
You can't calculate "moles of Cl2". You have two solids and a gas in equilibrium. At any temperature, there is an equilibrium pressure for the gas. That's all you know, unless you have a volume for the container, and can calculate the total amount of gas.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top