Calculating equilibrium point of a network of springs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the equilibrium position of a network of springs, each with identical spring constant k but varying resting lengths, fixed at one end in 3D space. The equilibrium point is determined by ensuring that the net forces in the x, y, and z directions equal zero, leading to three simultaneous equations. Valid equilibrium points correspond to minima of the total potential energy of the system, distinguishing between stable and unstable configurations. The user has developed a simplified spring network solver but seeks a theoretical approach to calculate forces without simulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Knowledge of simultaneous equations
  • Basic principles of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Hooke's Law and spring constants" for deeper insights into spring behavior
  • Explore "solving simultaneous equations" techniques for multi-variable systems
  • Study "potential energy minimization" methods in mechanical systems
  • Investigate "numerical methods for equilibrium calculations" in physics simulations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in modeling mechanical systems or studying the dynamics of spring networks.

o_z
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to find a way to calculate the resting position of a network of springs that is built as follows: n number of springs with identical k constant, but with different resting lengths are connected together at one end of each spring. The other end of each spring is fixed to some point in 3d space - meaning, that position cannot change by the spring, only the end that is connected to all the other springs can move.
Now, if I move the fixed positions of all/some of the springs, how can I calculate the resting (equilibrium) position in space of the point in which all springs are connected?


Thanks in advance,
Ofer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the "floating point". Each spring yields a force with an x component , a y component, and a z component. If we sum all the x components, we get the net force in the x direction. Likewise for y & z.

For the "floating point" to be in equilibrium, the net force in each direction (x,y,z) should be zero. Therefore we have three equations that we have to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneous_equations" :

Net force in x direction = 0
Net force in y direction = 0
Net force in z direction = 0

We have three equations and three unknowns (the coordinates of the floating point). Therefore we can solve these equations to get the equilibrium position of the floating point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Note however that not all solutions are valid equilibrium points.

For example consider the case where the fixed points are distributed on a circle with equal angular spacings. Then if the springs are under tension, the centre of the circle is an equilibrium point. However if the springs are in compression, then the centre point, though a solution to the equations above, is not a valid equilibrium point since it is unstable. What determines whether a solution to the above is a true equilibrium point is whether the point corresponds to a minima of the total potential energy of the system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_total_potential_energy_principle" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the replies!

The basic problem I'm having is: how do I know the force that each spring yields if I don't know the equilibrium point? What I mean is, I know the force's strength, but not it's vector. So how can I solve those equations without knowing the different x,y and z elements of the force?

In the mean time, I've written a simplified spring network solver for this specific case, that seems to solve the issue for my needs. But I'm still interested in knowing if there's a way to calculate that without simulation.

Thanks,
o
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
981
Replies
26
Views
5K