MHB Calculating Equity in Company A: 1.2% for $600,000.00

  • Thread starter Thread starter Confused00901
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    company
AI Thread Summary
To acquire 1.2% equity in Company A, valued at $50 million, a customer must invest $600,000. Since Company C holds 60% of Company A's value, it is worth $30 million. Therefore, to obtain the desired equity, the customer needs to purchase 2% of Company C, which equates to $600,000 divided by $30 million. The discussion highlights the complexities of equity distribution between Company A, B, and C. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate investment calculations.
Confused00901
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Company A’s value is stated at $50,000,000.00 the company is set up into 2 separate entities Company B with 40% equity and Company C with 60% equity. If a customer wants to own 1.2% of Company A, but only wants to hold part of Company C at 60%, how much would the customer have to spend to buy 1.2% of Company A?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.2% of Company A’s value of 50 million is 600,000

not clear what Company C’s equity of 30 million has to do with that 1.2%
 
They only want to buy into Company C, and not Company B. So what amount do they have to pay to invest in C since that company holds 60%?
 
Confused00901 said:
They only want to buy into Company C, and not Company B. So what amount do they have to pay to invest in C since that company holds 60%?

Purchasing 600,000 of equity from company C is still 1.2% of company A since C is contained within A.
Still not seeing how the equity shares of A held by B and C make any difference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll ask the accountant that question. Even though I own a business, I've never been involved in the money side of the business. This may have caused me to go bankrupt last year. I can't 100% blame the person who did all the accounting, but he should have warned me about possible financial difficulties. I had to consult with antonybatty.com for a month to restart the business successfully. Now I also work in the accounting industry, but it has become more difficult with the start of inflation worldwide.
 
I am interpreting he "only wants to hold part of Company C at 60%" to mean that he wants to buy only a share of company C, none of company B.

Company A is worth \$50,000,000. Company C is worth 60% of that, \$30,000,000. 1.2% of \$50,000,000 is \$600,000. He must buy $\frac{600000}{30000000}= 0.02$ or 2% of company C.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top