Calculating Error in Energy Measurement with Scintillation Counter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty in energy measurements derived from a scintillation counter, specifically using the linear equation energy = mx + c, where m is the gradient and c is the intercept. The user is struggling to convert the errors in the gradient and intercept, along with the uncertainty in channel numbers, into a final error for energy measurements. The provided gradient is 0.0037 with an error of 0.0002, and the intercept is -0.0187 with an error of 0.005, while the channel number has a constant uncertainty of ±2. A formula for calculating uncertainty in a function of multiple variables is mentioned, which could help in determining the overall error in energy. Understanding how to apply this uncertainty propagation formula is crucial for accurate lab reporting.
retupmoc
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi I am currently trying to write up a lab report for my 3rd year lab on the scintillation counter and I am struggling to convert the error i have for the gradient and intercept (using polyfit on excel) and the uncertainty i have in my x values, to the uncertainty in my energy measurements where energy=mx+c. c is the y intercept and m the gradient. The x value here is the channel number for the photo peak with an error of plus or minus 2, My gradient is 0.0037 with error 0.0002 and intercept -0.0187 with error 0.005. How do i get the error in energy from this, note the uncertainty in channel number was always 2 despite it ranging from 40 to 400. any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any hints?
 
Uncertainty for a general function f(a,b,c) can be calculated from

\sigma_f^2 = \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial a}\right)^2{\sigma_a}^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial b}\right)^2{\sigma_b}^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial c} \right)^2{\sigma_c}^2

It's easy to see how this equation would extend to a function of more variables.

--J
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top