Calculating Expectation Value of Angular Momentum Squared for Hydrogen Atom

sian130
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a hydrogen atom whose wave function at time t=0 is the following superposition of normalised energy eigenfunctions:

Ψ(r,t=0)=1/3 [2ϕ100(r) -2ϕ321(r) -ϕ430(r) ]

What is the expectation value of the angular momentum squared?

Homework Equations



I know that L2 operator is:

-ℏ2 [1/sinθ d/dθ sinθ d/dθ+1/(sin2 θ) d2/dϕ2 ]

although I don't think I need to use it.

I know L2=Lx2+Ly2+Lz2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused as to how to go about this. I don't think I need to be calculating an integral, as you would do to find the expectation value of, for example, x2 for a wavefunction. I think I need to calculate the number from squaring the coefficients of each part, and adding, but I'm not sure how to incorporate the L2 bit into this?

I would appreciate any help, I have been puzzling over this for ages now!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully you remember that the expectation value of L^2 in a state \vert\psi\rangle is
\langle\psi\vert L^2\vert\psi\rangle
When you plug in the given wavefunction, what do you get?

Now, what is the expectation value of L^2 in an eigenstate \vert\psi_{nlm}\rangle, in terms of the quantum numbers n,l,m?
 
Ok I know that:

〈H ̂ 〉= <S|H ̂|S>

which is:

=sum(a*nam<En|H|Em>)
=sum(a*nam<En|Em|Em>)
=sum(a*namEm<En|Em>)
=sum(a*namEmdeltamn)
=sum(|am|2 En)
=<E>

So am I right in thinking that I just have to do:

<L2> = sum(|coefficients|2 * L2)

If so, what do I use for L2?

Is it l(l+1)hbar2 ?

Thanks
 
Sounds like you're on the right track.
 
Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.

I did as above, and got:

1/3(22l(l+1)hbar2 + 22l(l+1)hbar2 + l(l+1)hbar2)

Then used the values of l given in the subscript of each eigenfunction, and got an overall answer of 12hbar2. Does that sound about right?

Thanks again x
 
sian130 said:
1/3(22l(l+1)hbar2 + 22l(l+1)hbar2 + l(l+1)hbar2)
At the beginning, remember that you get a factor of 1/3 from each \psi in
\langle\psi\vert L^2 \vert\psi\rangle
Other than that, it seems OK.
 
May I ask why you do not need to use the L^2 operator explicitly? How do you end up with your
sum(an* am <En|H|Em>) term?
 
Back
Top