Calculating Force Needed to Break Objects with a Maul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cemelion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Break Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of predicting the force required to break a maul or other objects under repeated stress. It highlights that while there is no general equation for this, concepts like fatigue life are relevant. The nature of the force, frequency of application, and material properties significantly influence the outcome. Examples include how glass can deform over time and how crack propagation can occur at high speeds. Ultimately, empirical testing remains the most straightforward way to determine the breaking point of materials.
Cemelion
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was splitting some wood the other day with an old maul and the maul broke. I was wondering if anyone knows of a formula to predict or give a sum of the force needed over time to break said maul.

so what i really want to know is how many times can i hit something with 600lbs of pressure with a maul that breaks after 1200lbs of pressure or.. how many beers can i open with a force of .000001lbs with a bottlecap remove that breaks after 70lbs of pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hahaha There were actually no theory for that problem.
The only way to find out is to do it until it get broken.
 


There is plenty of theory actually, but no general equation for it. It depends so heavily on the nature of the force, how often it occurs, the shape and material of the object and many other things. Look up fatigue life. That would be a good place to start.
 


kk, thanks guys... not a big deal just curious... i look into fatigue life
 


Way too complex for almost all materiels... ordinary glass for instance will deform over a long time due to pressure or gravity (old glass bottles you find in dumps are folded flat, old stained glass windows get thin at the top and thick at the bottom). Then, if you fracture glass, the speed of advancement of the crack can exceed 5000 feet per second, yet even what appears to be the motionless end of a static crack is really still continuing to advance very slowly as the molecular bonds maintain a minimum breaking rate (on the order of hundreds of bonds per hour for typical pane glass)... and that's just "simple" glass.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top