Calculating Forces on a Charge from Multiple Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter stobbz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total force acting on a +3nC charge from two +2nC charges using Coulomb's law. The user initially calculated the forces from each +2nC charge but arrived at a total force of 19.08 nano Newton in the x direction, which conflicted with the provided answer of 9.537 nano Newton. Through clarification and calculations, it was identified that a factor of two was incorrectly applied in the distance used in Coulomb's law. The user acknowledged the mistake and appreciated the assistance in resolving the confusion. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculations in electrostatic force problems.
stobbz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge +2nC is located at (0, 2 m). Another +2 nC charge is
located at (0, -2 m). A third charge, +3 nC, is located at (2 m, 0).
Calculate the total force (in vector form) acting on charge +3nC
from both +2nC charges.

Homework Equations



Coulomb's law in vector form

The Attempt at a Solution



I worked out the force on q3 due to q1 to be:

9.54 nano Newton in the positive x direction and
-9.54 nano Newton in the negative y direction

Next, I worked out the force on q3 due to q2 and got:

9.54 nano Newton in the positive x direction and in the positive y direction.

Adding these together, the component would be zero and the total force would be 19.08 nano Newton in the x direction. This would be my answer. However, the answer given is 9.537 nano Newton in the x direction.

Any help is appreciated!
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the difference between "in the x direction" and "in the positive x direction"?:confused:
 
gneill said:
What is the difference between "in the x direction" and "in the positive x direction"?:confused:

Nothing, I've changed it to avoid any more confusion :smile:
 
stobbz said:

I worked out the force on q3 due to q1 to be:

9.54 nano Newton in the positive x direction and
-9.54 nano Newton in the negative y direction

So, a force in the positive y-direction?

19.08 nano Newton in the x direction. This would be my answer. However, the answer given is 19.08 nano Newton in the positive x direction.
You got the right answer?

Please correct and I'll see if I can help...
 
hadoque said:
So, a force in the positive y-direction?


You got the right answer?

Please correct and I'll see if I can help...

Ahh sorry, the given answer is 9.537 nN.
 
So it looks like you've mucked up a factor of two somewhere. Can you show your calculations? What value did you use for the distance in Coulomb's law?
 
gneill said:
So it looks like you've mucked up a factor of two somewhere. Can you show your calculations? What value did you use for the distance in Coulomb's law?

I used 4 (two squared) for the position vector and root 2/2 for the unit vector. This is for the x component for the force on q3 exerted by q1.
 
Let's take the case of q1 and q3. q1 is at (0,2), while q3 is at (2,0). The distance betwixt is:

\sqrt{(2 - 0)^2 + (0 - 2)^2} = \sqrt{4 + 4} = 2 \sqrt{2} (meters)
 
r13 = (2, -2), unit vector r = root 2 / 2 in the x direction - root 2 / 2 in the y direction,

F13 = Q1Q3 * unit vector / 4 PI Epsilon nought r^2

(with r = 2)
 
  • #10
Ahh ok, now I see where I was going wrong!

Thanks for walking me through that gneill, massively appreciate it.
 
Back
Top