Calculating Fragment Numbers: Biotechnology and Plasmids Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter LadiesMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biotechnology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of fragments produced when a 150,000 base pair linear DNA is digested by a restriction enzyme with a seven-base-pair recognition site. Initial calculations incorrectly suggest dividing the total base pairs by seven, leading to an unrealistic fragment number. A more accurate approach considers the total possible recognition sites, calculated as 4^7, resulting in approximately 9 fragments when dividing the total length of DNA by this number. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how restriction enzymes function rather than simply dividing by the recognition site length. Ultimately, the correct estimate of fragments produced is around 9.
LadiesMan
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A piece of linear DNA is 150 000 base pairs in length and it is digested with a restriction enzyme that recognizes a seven-base-pair recognition site. How many fragments do you predict would be produced? Show your calculations.

I would say, 150000bp / 7 = 21428.57 fragments (Weird...)

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A restriction enzyme cuts the DNA at the recognition site. Not every seven base pairs.
 
Hmm, but we don't know how many restriction enzymes are on that linear piece of DNA.
 
maybe:

4 nitrogenous pairs each base pair so 4^7 = 16384 (base pairs) then 150000 divide by 16384 which gives us 9.15 so approximately 9 fragments.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top