Calculating Gauge Pressure and Water Flow in a Multi-Floor House

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwert13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating gauge pressure and water flow in a multi-floor house. The gauge pressure at a second-floor faucet, located 6.3 m above the main water line with a pressure of 1.90 x 10^5 Pa, is determined to be 61,740 Pa, accounting for the pressure drop due to the height of the water column. Clarification was provided regarding the correct interpretation of the gauge pressure value. Additionally, the minimum pressure required to ensure water flows from a faucet was discussed, emphasizing the importance of accurate pressure measurements. The conversation highlights the need for careful calculations in fluid dynamics scenarios.
qwert13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The main water line enters a house on the first floor. The line has a gauge pressure of 1.90 multiplied by 105 Pa.
(a) A faucet on the second floor, 6.3 m above the first floor, is turned off. What is the gauge pressure at this faucet?
(b) How high could a faucet be before no water would flow from it, even if the faucet were open?

Homework Equations


P=F/A
density= m/v
Fbuoyancy= (density)Vg
P + (1/2)(density)(v)^2 + (density)gh = constant
P= (density)gh

The Attempt at a Solution


P= 1000(9.8)(6.3) = 61740? not right. I'm not sure what else to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? It's due tonight so if someone could give me a couple of tips that would be great. thanks in advance
 
1. (a) It's 61740 Pa below the gauge pressure on the lower floor, since the pressure applied by the 6.3 m water column is part of the water pressure felt on the first floor. Are you sure the line's gauge pressure is 1.90*105 Pa and not 1.90*105 kPa?

(b) What's the minimum water pressure necessary to force water out?
 
Yeah actually the pressure is 1.9 x10^5 Pa not 1.9 x 105 Pa. I accidentally typed it wrong onto the computer
 
ok I figured it out. Thank you so much ideasrule for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top