Calculating Genetic Probabilities with Punnet Squares

  • Thread starter Thread starter at2341
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating genetic probabilities using Punnet squares, specifically addressing the confusion around the addition rule for probabilities. It clarifies that the probability of wearing shirt #1 or pants #1 is not simply 100% when considering both items. Instead, one must evaluate the total possible outcomes and how many meet the criteria of wearing at least one of the items. If the condition is to wear either shirt #1 or pants #1, both can be included in the outcomes. However, if the condition specifies wearing one but not both, the outcomes must exclude combinations where both items are worn.
at2341
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to work out genetic probabilities using the punnet square.

Let's say I have 2 shirts and 2 pants. The odds of me wearing shirt #1 is 1/2. The odds of me wearing pants #1 is 1/2. Does this mean that the odds of me wearing shirt #1 or Pants #1 is 1 (100%) (addition rule - 1/2 + 1/2). This seems counterintuitive.

Is the answer that I have to subtract out from 100% the odds of me wearing BOTH shirt #1 and pants #1?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
at2341 said:
I'm trying to work out genetic probabilities using the punnet square.

Let's say I have 2 shirts and 2 pants. The odds of me wearing shirt #1 is 1/2. The odds of me wearing pants #1 is 1/2. Does this mean that the odds of me wearing shirt #1 or Pants #1 is 1 (100%) (addition rule - 1/2 + 1/2). This seems counterintuitive.
No, it's not simple addition.

When you are looking at the probability of wearing shirt 1 OR pants 1, how many possible outcomes total do you have of shirts and/or pants? And how many possible outcomes would fulfill the requirement of having shirt 1 OR pants 1? [/quote]
Is the answer that I have to subtract out from 100% the odds of me wearing BOTH shirt #1 and pants #1?
No, that's not what you would subtract out. Though, one should be careful of how the question is phrased. If you need to determine any combination where shirt 1 or pants 1 (or both) is included, then both is within that same set of outcomes you need to consider, and the only outcome that will NOT satisfy your conditions is shirt 2 and pants 2 together.

On the other hand, if it says shirt 1 OR pants 1, but NOT both, then the outcome with shirt 1 AND pants 1, as well as the outcome of shirt 2 AND pant 2, are both excluded.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top