Calculating H3O+ Concentration for Acetic Acid Solution | Ka = 1.8 x 10-5

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the H3O+ concentration in a 0.100 M acetic acid solution with a Ka of 1.8 x 10-5, one must use the equilibrium expression for weak acids. The concentration of H3O+ is not simply equal to Ka; instead, it involves setting up an ICE table to determine the change in concentration at equilibrium. The correct approach involves taking the square root of the product of Ka and the initial concentration of acetic acid. This results in an H3O+ concentration of approximately 1.3 x 10-3 M, corresponding to option d. Understanding the underlying equations and concepts is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
2200andbeyond
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the H3O+ concentration of a 0.100 M acetic acid solution (Ka = 1.8 x 10-5)?
a. 1.8 x 10-5
b. 1.8 x 10-4
c. 1.3 x 10-2
d. 1.3 x 10-3
e. 0.9 x 10-3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



so the question is supposed to be D. but I thought that The Ka tells the concentration of the H3O+! Doesn't it ?!

I think you're supposed to take the square root of 1.8 x 10-5 the multiply it by 0.1
BUT WHY?!

thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2200andbeyond said:
I think you're supposed to take the square root of 1.8 x 10-5 the multiply it by 0.1
BUT WHY?!

Something that might sound like that but you have got it jumbled.

The answer and the right equation is explicitly there in the source given by Borek but I am not sure it would be helping you to direct you to it. You will forget the formula again like you already have by the next time you need to use it, so you need the ability to work out what it is.

Write down the equations you have to use, and if you do not then see, show them to us and we will further help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top