Calculating Halley's Comet Period and Next Approx. Viewing Date

  • Thread starter Thread starter carney
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Period
AI Thread Summary
Halley's Comet, with a semi-major axis of 17.96 AU and an eccentricity of 0.9673, last passed perihelion on February 9, 1986. The period of the comet can be calculated using the formula T = 2π(sqrt(a^3/μ), where μ corresponds to the Sun's gravitational parameter, not Earth's. The discussion clarifies that comets orbit the Sun, not Earth, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct gravitational parameter for Halley's Comet to determine its orbital period and future viewing dates. The consensus is that calculations should be based on Halley's orbit around the Sun.
carney
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Halley’s Comet passed perihelion on 9 February 1986. It has a semi-major axis
a = 17.96 AU and eccentricity e = 0.9673. (One astronomical unit (AU) is the distance
between the Earth and the Sun.) Calculate the period of Halley’s Comet and the
approximate date on which you might next see it.

Homework Equations



Period = T = 2pi(sqrt(a^3/u)

The Attempt at a Solution


I realize all this information is available over the internet but I need to work it out by hand.
I attempted this question first using the value for 'a' given and the standard gravitational parameter (u) of Earth 3.986E14 but realized this is wrong and that halley's comet would have a different value of (u). I assume the equation for the value of (u) of halley's comet will be related to its eccentricity but can't seem to work it out. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In determining (u), what does Halley's comet orbit?
 
Janus said:
In determining (u), what does Halley's comet orbit?

i just assumed from the question that it was orbiting earth.
 
What do comets typically orbit?
 
Janus said:
What do comets typically orbit?

thats a very bad assumption. they orbit the sun and i can just look that value up. but using what I've been given and only those values is it possible to work this question out?
 
:eek:


It is an excellent assumption.

carney, I give you my blessing to assume your calculations are meant to have Halley's comet orbitng the Sun, not Earth.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top