Calculating heat output from current

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating heat output from electrical current in the context of heat transfer, particularly focusing on the relationship between current, resistance, and heat generation. Participants explore theoretical and practical implications, including the efficiency of electrical transmission and the concept of combined heat and power.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to calculate heat generation given current and resistivity without voltage, suggesting that voltage may be necessary.
  • Another participant asserts that voltage is not needed if the resistance can be determined from the dimensions of the resistor, proposing the formula Power = I² * R.
  • A participant reflects on discussions with engineers about combined heat and power, linking the inefficiencies of electrical transmission to heat generation, emphasizing that heat dissipation depends solely on current, not voltage.
  • Further elaboration is provided on how high voltage transmission reduces current, thereby minimizing heat loss, with a specific example illustrating the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance.
  • Another participant discusses the design considerations for power transmission, noting how the choice of voltage affects conductor size and associated costs, while questioning their own arithmetic and logic in the calculations presented.
  • One participant mentions the thermodynamic cycle in combined heat and power systems, explaining the benefits of reusing exhaust steam for heating purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of voltage in calculating heat generation, and there is an ongoing debate regarding the efficiency of electrical transmission systems. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions regarding resistance, dimensions of conductors, and the implications of voltage on heat generation and transmission efficiency. Some calculations and logic are presented without thorough verification, indicating potential uncertainties in the reasoning.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrical engineering, heat transfer, or energy systems, particularly in the context of transmission efficiency and combined heat and power systems.

timsea81
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
This is actually a heat transfer question but what I don't understand is the electrical part of it.

Given the current (in amps) and the resistivity (in ohm x seconds), how do I figure out how much heat is being generated? I would think you would need to know the voltage as well, but it is not given.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don't need to know the voltage but you do need to know the dimensions of the resistor so that you can work out the resistance.

Once you do know the resistance, Power = I 2 * R
 
I found the formula for this but was still having trouble grasping it conceptually, but I just realized something.

A few weeks ago I was talking to some mechanical and electrical engineers about combined heat and power. Combined heat and power, aka co-generation or co-gen, is generating electricity on site, usually by burning natural gas, and using the waste heat to heat your buildings, domestic hot water, or some other process.

All of the mechanical guys were saying what a great system it is, and amongst our reasons for this is minimizing voltage drop by generating electricity on site. The electrical guy disagreed, saying that voltage drop is negligible and the grid system is not flawed (although the generation systems certainly are).

Now I realize that the part that I wasn't understanding about the inefficiencies of the grid and the part I was not understanding about this problem are one in the same. The heat generated by electrical current, which represents the energy wasted through voltage drop, depends on current only, not voltage. So when power is transmitted at high voltage, since the current is therefore low, so is the heat dissipation, and so is the wasted energy.

Say you needed to transmit 100,000 VA from point A to point B. If you were to transmit it at 100V, the energy wasted through heat dissipation would be proportional to the 1,000A current. If you were to step up the voltage to 100,000V, the current would only be 1A and the wasted energy would be proportional to 1A. Because heat generation depends on current ONLY, not voltage.
 
Transmission guys design for the loss they want to tolerate,
let's just say they can afford to lose 3% of the power along a line.
Power is volts times amps.

At high voltage the current is small so you can use small conductors and get 3% voltage drop. In your example you could tolerate 3kv drop at 1 amp, 3000 ohms.

At low voltage the current is high so you need large conductors to get 3% voltage drop.
In your example that would be 3 volts at 1000 amps which is 0.003 ohms.

Resistance of wire is in proportion to 1/(its area) and area X length is volume of copper required to make the wire...
So for a given line length, 3000/.003 = 1,000,000
A thousandfold increase in voltage yields a millionfold decrease in copper required?
somebody please check my arithmetic and logic...i haven't had my coffee yet.

Textbooks say it's mostly the cost of those huge conductors and the impracticality of towers to support them that makes high voltage economical. Longer insulators are cheap in comparison.
#10 wire is quite close to one milli-ohm per foot. It's about diameter of a soda straw.
To get .003 ohms per thousand feet would be something like three hundred strands of #10, fifteen hundred strands to get .003 ohms per mile..
but a single strand of it is only 5.2 ohms per mile, more than adequate for your high voltage transmission.
I think your example drives home what the textbooks say, but again sanity checks are welcome.


Your mechanical friends are doubtless looking at the thermodynamic cycle.
Exhaust steam from a turbine is condensed into water so you can pump it back into the boiler, and the heat of vaporization is lost. That amounts to ~1000 BTU/pound which is quite a lot.
If you can loan that exhaust steam to a nearby bulding where they can condense it to warm themselves then pump it back to you condensed into water, everybody wins including the environment.



old jim
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K