Calculating Impact Forces on a Human Being Struck by a Moving Vehicle

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the impact force on a human struck by a vehicle involves complex biomechanics and requires specific details about the incident. Experts often consult on these matters, especially in legal cases following traffic accidents. While force and pressure are commonly discussed, energy and momentum provide a clearer understanding of the situation. The assessment of injuries post-impact can offer better insights into the forces involved. Overall, the calculation of impact forces is nuanced and not solely reliant on basic measurements.
kevin perkins
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you calculate the amount of pounds per square inch force on say a female human being approximately five feet tall at 185 pounds at rest being struck by a moving vehicle at motion by gravity with a curb weight of 2700 lbs going 4 mph.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a complicated question that requires lots of details not given.

Experts in biomechanics get paid lots of money to consult on these questions when traffic incidents result in lawsuits.
 
Also, force (or pressure) isn't necessarily a useful thing to know. Energy and momentum probably tell you more.
 
Most injury criteria are in terms of force and pressure.
 
As I understand it they
 
As I understand it they look at how far the person travels after impact and can only give a very rough idea of the likely impact forces and velocities.

I think you get a better idea from the impact injuries.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top