Calculating Impedance in an RLC circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the impedance across points ab in an RLC circuit with given values for frequency, inductance, resistance, and capacitance. The circuit configuration includes a series inductor and capacitor in parallel with a resistor. Initial calculations for capacitive and inductive reactances yielded incorrect impedance results, highlighting the need to treat the reactances as parallel components rather than simply summing them. The correct approach involves using complex impedance calculations, leading to a final impedance of approximately 0.504 Ω with a phase angle of -59.7°. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting circuit layouts for impedance calculations.
lpau001
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the impedance Zab across ab.
w=0.75 Hz
wo=1 Hz.
L=1 H
R=1 Ohm
C=1 F

Inductor and Capacitor are in series, and together are in parallel with the resistor.

circuit looks like a capital A, but square on top, and rotated 90 degrees clockwise.. if that makes sense.

Homework Equations


Zeq=sqrt(R2 +(XL-XC)2)
XC=1/(wC)
XL=wL

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the equations above, I found XC to be 4/3 and XL to be .075.
inputting those in the impedance equations, I get
Z=sqrt(12 + (4/3-.75)2)
which is 1.1577 which is wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your circuit layout, you've got a resistance in parallel with a reactance (the net result of the sum of the capacitive and inductive reactances). You don't just sum them to get the result, they combine like parallel resistances.

It might be easier to use the complex form for the impedance and do the math.

Zr = 1Ω, Zx = -0.583jΩ, then the net impedance is

Z = Zr*Zx/(Zr + Zx)
 
gneill said:
If I understand your circuit layout, you've got a resistance in parallel with a reactance (the net result of the sum of the capacitive and inductive reactances). You don't just sum them to get the result, they combine like parallel resistances.

It might be easier to use the complex form for the impedance and do the math.

Zr = 1Ω, Zx = -0.583jΩ, then the net impedance is

Z = Zr*Zx/(Zr + Zx)

I actually did try this in an earlier attempt, because I thought this was right, but apparently not.
1/Z=1/Zr + 1/Zx

I'm stuck, and I actually ran out of attempts on the HW, but this is more out of curiosity now than anything.

Thanks, Gneill
 
Z = Zr*Zx/(Zr + Zx)

= 1*(-0.583j)/(1 + -0.583j) Ω

= -0.583j/(1 - 0.583j) Ω

Normalizing,

= 0.254 - 0.435j Ω

This has magnitude |Z| = 0.504 Ω, and phase angle -59.7°
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top