MHB :Calculating $k$ to Find Wire Length

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the constant $k$ to determine the length of a wire based on its resistance and diameter. It is established that electrical resistance varies directly with the length and inversely with the square of the diameter. Given a wire that is 432 feet long with a resistance of 1.24 Ω and a diameter of 4 mm, the value of $k$ is calculated as 0.04592. The formula used is R = k(L/D²), which helps in finding the resistance for a different wire with a resistance of 1.44 Ω and a diameter of 3 mm. The importance of using consistent units in calculations is also emphasized.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{2.5.1}$
Electrical Resistance of a Wire
The electrical resistance of a wire varies directly with the length of the wire and inversely with the square of the diameter of the wire.
If a wire 432 feet long and 4 mm in diameter has a resistance of 1.24 $\Omega$
find the length of a wire of the same material whose resistance is 1.44 $\Omega$ and whose diameter is 3 mm

y varies inversely with x $\quad y=\dfrac{k}{x}$
y varies directly with x $\quad y=kx$

OK not real sure how to set this up think we need to get the value of $k$ first
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, by the problem statement [math]R \propto L[/math] and [math]R \propto \dfrac{1}{d^2}[/math]. Thus
[math]R = k \dfrac{L}{d^2}[/math]

Is this what you were asking about?

-Dan
 
yes,
 
Last edited:
$1.24 = k \dfrac{L}{d^2}=k \dfrac{432}{(4)^2}$

$k=0.04592$

so far hopefully

added to Google calendar
 
Last edited:
karush said:
$1.24 = k \dfrac{L}{d^2}=k \dfrac{432}{(4)^2}$

$k=0.04592$

so far hopefully

added to Google calendar
Units! (They are really weird units.) This is a Physics problem. All quantities with units must be stated with what they are.

So far so good. So use [math]R = k \dfrac{L}{d^2}[/math] again to find R.

-Dan
 
karush said:
$\tiny{2.5.1}$
Electrical Resistance of a Wire
The electrical resistance of a wire varies directly with the length of the wire and inversely with the square of the diameter of the wire.
If a wire 432 feet long and 4 mm in diameter has a resistance of 1.24 $\Omega$
find the length of a wire of the same material whose resistance is 1.44 $\Omega$ and whose diameter is 3 mm

y varies inversely with x $\quad y=\dfrac{k}{x}$
y varies directly with x $\quad y=kx$

OK not real sure how to set this up think we need to get the value of $k$ first
Do you understand that you need ONE equation, not two? And of course you don't want to use "x" for both length and diameter.

Letting "R" be electrical resistance", L be the length, and D the diameter of the wire, since R varie directly with L and inversely with the square D,
$R= k\frac{L}{D^2}$.

Now, yes, you need to find k. For that you need to know every thing except k.
You are told "a wire 432 feet long and 4 mm in diameter has a resistance of 1.24 Ω".
So $1.24= k\frac{432}{4^2}$. Solve that for k.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top