Calculating Ka of HCN: Ask for Help Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aly
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acid dissociation constant (Ka) for HCN, the equilibrium concentration of CN- was determined to be 0.13M in a solution with a pH of 9.70. KCN, a strong electrolyte, dissociates completely, providing a CN- concentration of 0.18 mol/L. The hydronium ion concentration was calculated using the pH, resulting in [H3O+] = 2.3 x 10^(-10) mol/L. Substituting these values into the Ka equation yields Ka = 1.67 x 10^(-10) for HCN. This calculation provides a clear understanding of the acid's strength in solution.
Aly
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hi forum,
would nebody be able to help me solve this problem?

0.18mol of potassium cyanide (KCN) was dissolved in 1.00L of a solution in which the pH was held constant at 9.70 at a temperature of 298K.

the equilibrium concentration of CN- was 0.13M.

Calculate Ka for the weak acid HCN.

ne help would be greatly appreciated. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of an electrolyte is KCN? What do you think will happen when KCN is put in a solution the pH of which is "held constant"? What are the ions in solution? What are the constraints?

How about showing us what your reasoning/working is so far, first?
 


Hi there! I can definitely help you with this problem. To calculate Ka for HCN, we can use the following equation:

Ka = [H3O+][CN-] / [HCN]

First, we need to find the concentration of HCN in the solution. Since KCN is a strong electrolyte, it completely dissociates into K+ and CN-. This means that the concentration of CN- is also 0.18 mol/L. Since the pH is 9.70, we can use the equation pH = -log[H3O+] to find the concentration of H3O+:

9.70 = -log[H3O+]
[H3O+] = 10^(-9.70)
[H3O+] = 2.3 x 10^(-10) mol/L

Now, we can plug these values into the Ka equation:

Ka = (2.3 x 10^(-10) mol/L)(0.13 mol/L) / (0.18 mol/L)
Ka = 1.67 x 10^(-10)

Therefore, the Ka for HCN is 1.67 x 10^(-10). I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top