Calculating Law of Levers Moments

  • Thread starter Thread starter The P-manator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Moments
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the law of levers, it is clarified that the moments calculated for two ends of the same lever must be equal. If considering different levers, the moments do not need to be the same. The concept is linked to the conservation of energy, where the work done on the lever must equal the work done by the lever. This relationship emphasizes that the force applied and the distance moved are critical in determining the moments. Overall, understanding the context of the moments is essential for accurate calculations in lever mechanics.
The P-manator
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
When you calculate the two moments for the law of the levers, they are supposed to be the same, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you had better give us more information on the problem! My first thought was that if you are talking about two different moments on two different levers, then, no, they don't have to be the same!

I like to think of it in terms of conservation of energy: Work done on the lever is the force you apply times the distance that end of the lever moves and that must be equal to the work done by the lever: the force the lever applies times the distance the end of the lever doing the work moves. I think you will find that that is the same as saying that the two moments (of the two ends of the same lever!) must be the same.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Torque and Moment of Inertia of a Lever Arm
Replies
2
Views
3K
Discover the Law of Levers: Uncovering Evidence and Documents | Prove It Now!
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Dynamics of systems of material points
Replies
2
Views
1K
Law of the lever without (infinitesimal) displacements
Replies
5
Views
2K
About torque and moment of inertia
Replies
30
Views
7K
Does the weight of a lever influences the amplification?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Resolve moment of inertia at an angle
Replies
2
Views
2K
What is the Mechanical Advantage of this lever? (for pulling tree stumps)
Replies
8
Views
7K
B Springboard physics questions for diving coach at YMCA
Replies
12
Views
2K
Question about the moment/torque principle
Replies
19
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top