Calculating Loads of Cables Attached to Horizontal Bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorvald
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the loads in cables attached to a horizontal bar when a force is applied off-center. Participants explore the mechanics of tension and compression in the system, aiming to understand how the applied force affects the load distribution in the cables.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving cables attached to a horizontal bar, expressing uncertainty about their calculations regarding the load distribution when pulling off-center.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of recognizing that the bar is in compression and suggests using geometric information to take moments for load apportionment.
  • There is a discussion about the direction of forces in tension and compression members, with some participants clarifying their understanding of these concepts.
  • One participant questions how to calculate the forces if T1 is known, noting the presence of too many unknowns in the system.
  • Another participant suggests taking moments about a specific point to derive relationships between the forces, providing a formula for T3 based on the applied load W.
  • A participant acknowledges their language barrier in understanding technical explanations but expresses intent to try the suggested method of taking moments.
  • Later, a participant realizes that the expected load distribution (T3 = T4 = ½W) only holds when the load W is centered, expressing frustration about the limitations of their current system.
  • There is a mention of considering alternative systems or configurations to achieve the desired load distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mechanics of tension and compression in the system, but there is no consensus on how to achieve the desired load distribution when the applied force is off-center. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the calculations and configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on geometric configurations and the need for specific assumptions about the system's setup to accurately calculate the forces involved. The discussion highlights unresolved mathematical steps and the complexity of the system.

Thorvald
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I was trying to calculate a situation where you have a piece of cable that is attached to a horizontal bar and then the two ends of the cables goes up vertically and is attached. Now I pull in the part of the cable hanging down under the horizontal bar - but I don't pull in the center line, I pull off center. What will be the loads in the cables to the left and right of the pull and what will be the vertical loads in the cables where they are attached.

I don't think my calculation is correct - and this is 2nd try. It is ideal if T6 = T7 = ½T1 as my calculation shows, but I have a feeling that it is not correct. But I have run out of good ideas on how to make the correct calculation. I guess the main problem is that I divide T1 by ½ in the beginning. But I can't figure out how T1 is split in the 2 forces.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
This revised diagram should help you proceed.

You need to realize
That the bar is in compression to maintain equilibrium of points A and B.
That the forces in a compression member point outwards and in a tension member point inwards.

To solve this you need some geometric information so you can take moments to apportion the load between the wires.
 

Attachments

  • Image1.jpg
    Image1.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 426
Studiot said:
This revised diagram should help you proceed.

You need to realize
That the bar is in compression to maintain equilibrium of points A and B.
That the forces in a compression member point outwards and in a tension member point inwards.

To solve this you need some geometric information so you can take moments to apportion the load between the wires.

Yes this is exactly the system I tried to explain. Very good. Yes of course the bar is a compression bar and the wires are tension members. If I put arrows on a member (2 arrows to show compression and tension), I have allways showed compression as two arrows pointing towards each other and tension as two arrows pointing away from each other (because the force is trying to rip the tension member apart).

But ok, that is a detail. But how to calculate the forces if force T1 is known? Do you mean, calculating moment equilibrium around one of the 3 points in the triangle (probably on of the 2 top points)?? But isn't there still too many unknown forces?

Oh and actually the system that you and I have sketched is only part of the system. See attached.

I pull with known force T1 (1,5 kN is just an example until I solve how to calculate it). The "T1-cable, goes up to point 4, through the cable 3-1-2 and is attached at point 1, so it can't move through this cable. Now cable 1-4 and 1-2 will be subjected to tension. In point 2 the cable continues up vertically. At point 4, the cable will provide a force downwards and inwards at the bar. The downwards part of the force will give a tension reaction in the cables passing 3 and 2. The cable 1-3 is left out of the equation (I think), because it can't take compression.

My goal was to find a geometric system where the load T1, results in the vertical end loads "T6" and "T7", that are T6 = T7 = ½T1. - If possible when T1 is off the centerline. But to understand how to get to that goal (if possible at all), I need of course to understand the calculation of this first system (see below).

Forcesinwiressketch.jpg
 
Have you actually tried taking moments?

In my diagram let L be the length of the bar and let the line of action of W be a distance d from A.

Taking moments about A

T4,T2,C1 all pass through A and have zero moment.
T1 appears twice in opposite directions so exerts zero net moment

That leaves (T3 x L) = (W x d)

so T3 = wd/L

does this help?
 
No I didn't yet try to take moments, as I didn't understand exactly what you meant. I had an idea that it was what you just explained, but wasn't sure. English is not my main language, so sometimes when speaking technical stuff, I not allways understand everything exactly.

But I will try to do after your explanation. I think it helps, yes... :-)
 
Yes I got now the loads in T3 and T4. But it was not exactly the result I was hoping for. I mean, I can see that even with the longer bar and extra wire, I won't get T3 = T4 = ½W, when W is off center.

I is allowed to install the bar at an angle, but I don't think it helps. What system could do that? If I wrap W around or into a "wheel" with a tangent in the center line and W going to the middle of the bar, this "wheel" will just rotate.

Hmm, have to think more about this.
 

Attachments

Now you have T3 and T4, equilibrium and simple geometry gives you T1 , T2 and C1.

Yes of course the equations reduce to T3 = T4 = W/2, only when W is placed halfway between A and B.

Tilting the bar does not affect this since the moments are derived from perpendicular distances.
I don't understand the last comment about W and a wheel.
 
Yes with T3 and T4, equilibrium and geometry gives me T1, T2 and C1. And yes T3 = T4 = W/2 only if W is placed halfway between A and B, I can see that from the equations.

I will explain the other things later, I have a slight idea of how maybe I can do what I'd like (I need to make another system).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
Replies
22
Views
5K