Calculating Mass and Center of Mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass and center of mass of a lamina defined as the upper half of a disc with a specific density function. The problem involves integration techniques and considerations of symmetry in the context of polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial approach of integrating over a rectangular region and question the appropriateness of this method given the circular boundary. There is a suggestion to use polar coordinates, with some participants expressing uncertainty about converting the density function into polar form.

Discussion Status

Several participants are exploring different integration methods and bounds. Some have provided alternative approaches using polar coordinates, while others are clarifying the definitions and variables involved. There is an ongoing examination of the integration setup without a clear consensus on the final mass calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion regarding the density function and the variable representation, as well as the need to correctly establish integration bounds for the polar coordinate system.

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let D be the upper half of the disc x2+y2 ≤1(that is, the part of the disc with y ≥ 0). Suppose the lamina Ω fills the region D, and has density given by ρ(x, y) = |x|.

(a) Calculate the mass of the lamina.
(b) Find the coordinates of the center of mass of the lamina.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So, first, I'm going to rewrite this |x| as y=-x when for when x≤0 and y=x for when x≥0. Therefore, the quarter-circle given by the boundary in the first quadrant allows 0≤x≤1 and 0≤y≤1.

I integrate ∫(0≤x≤1)∫(0≤y≤1) x dydx and get 1/2. Observing that everything is symmetrical, I simply multiply by 2 to find the total mass, which I find to be 1.

Again, by symmetry, I reason that the center of mass must lie on the y-axis, so I will let the x-coordinate of the center of mass equal 0. To find the y-coordinate, I integrate

∫(0≤x≤1)∫(0≤y≤1) xy dydx + ∫(-1≤x≤0)∫(0≤y≤1) -xy dxdy (?)

and get 1/2. Therefore, the center of mass exists at (0,1/2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you're integrating over a rectangular region in your solution, but the region given is the upper half of a disk. Also, polar coordinates seem like they would be more friendly here.
 
I was thinking polar would be easier, too. But I didn't know how to convert y = |x| into polar coordinates. But, yes, clearly my bounds are not correct.
 
well your bounds should be pretty easy, theta goes from 0 to pi and r goes from 0 to 1. Your question of rho = |x| comes down to knowing x = r cos(theta) and |r cos(theta)| = r |cos(theta)|, which is just a question of knowing where cos(theta) is positive and where it is negative.
 
Okay. So, first, why have you replaced y with rho in y = |x|? Does rho = rsin(theta)?

But anyway, let's see if I can integrate this properly. I think I should have the sum of two integrals so that I can deal with the bounds independently. So, cos(theta) is non-negative in 0≤theta≤pi/2. I think one of my integrals should then be

∫(0≤theta≤pi/2)∫(0≤r≤1) r^2 * cos(theta) dr dtheta.

This gives me 1/3. My other integral is

∫(pi/2≤theta≤pi)∫(0≤r≤1) r^2 * -1 * cos(theta) dr dtheta.

This, unexpectedly, also gives 1/3. Therefore mass is 2/3 (?)
 
i did this because in the problem statement you said rho = |x|. But yes, this looks to be correct.
 
Are you referring to Ω? Isn't that omega?
 
\rho (x,y) = |x|
 
Oh, right. I'm just being stupid.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K