Calculating Mass of Star from Orbital Distance and Period

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of a star from its orbital distance and period, the resulting mass was found to be 2.31 x 10^30 kg. To express this mass in terms of the Sun's mass, one must take the ratio of the star's mass to the Sun's mass. This involves dividing the calculated mass of the star by the mass of the Sun. Understanding this ratio clarifies how the star's mass compares to our Sun. This method is essential for astrophysical calculations involving stellar masses.
bigtymer8700
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
iI was asked to find the mass of a star given the orbital distance and the period. my mass came out to be 2.31^30 kg. Its then asking me to express it in terms of our sun's mass. Really don't understand what it means by that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You take the ratio. You just divide your star's mass by that of the sun.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top