Calculating Mass of the Moon with Apollo 11 Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter leyyee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Moon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of the Moon using Apollo 11 data, specifically the spacecraft's mass, orbital period, and distances from the Moon's center. Participants reference Kepler's laws and gravitational equations to derive the Moon's mass, confirming that the semi-major axis is essential for the calculations. The average distance from the Moon's center is calculated as 1849.5 km, which is used in the mass determination. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding Kepler's third law in this context. Ultimately, the participants collaboratively clarify the necessary steps to solve the problem.
leyyee
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Before landing men on the moon, Apollo 11 space vehicle was put into orbit about the moon. The mass of the vehicle was 9979kg and the period of the orbit was 119 min. The maximum and minimum distances from the center of the moon were 1861 km and 1838km . Assuming the moon to be a uniform spherical body, what is the mass of the moon according to these data?


Homework Equations



GMm/R^2
elliptic equation?


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the kepler's law and Gravitational equation.. It seems I can't get the mass of the moon. Anyone can help me through?

thankx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Period, distance and mass will suggest Newton's version of Keplers's third law. You will have to work out what the semi major axis is though.
 
is the semi major axis the radius for the r^3 in the kepler's thrid law? I use the (1861+1838)/2 is correct that this is the value for r? 1849.5?

thank for replying..
 
Last edited:
Yes Kepler's 3rd is based on the semi major axis. You have correctly worked it out.
 
thanks then I think I got of correct d.. Thanks..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top