Calculating Maximum Silver Plating from AgNO3 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ki-nana18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the maximum amount of silver that can be plated from a 4.6 L AgNO3 solution with 3.7% silver by mass, first determine the mass of the solution using its density of 1.01 g/mL. The total mass of the solution is approximately 4660 g (4.6 L x 1000 mL/L x 1.01 g/mL). Next, apply the mass percent formula to find the mass of silver: 3.7% of 4660 g yields about 172.42 g of silver. This calculation confirms the maximum amount of silver that can be plated from the solution. The problem illustrates the importance of understanding mass percent and solution density in quantitative chemistry.
Ki-nana18
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Silver nitrate solutions are often used to plate silver onto other metals. What is the maximum amount of silver (in grams) that can be plated out of 4.6 L of an AgNO3 solution containing 3.7% Ag by mass? Assume that the density of the solution is 1.01g/mL .


Homework Equations


m=moles of solute/ mass of solvent (kg)
mass percent=(mass of component/ total mass of solution)*100%


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to even approach this problem so maybe just a hint can help me gain some sort of insight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start finding mass of the solution, then apply percentage information.
 
Thank you so much, I figured it out and got it right. :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top