Calculating Mean and Covariance Matrix with New Variables?

retspool
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
My professor sucks
she hasnt gone over mean vector and she expects up to solve this

let z1, z2, z3 be the random variables with mean vector and covariance matrix given below

mean vector = [1 2 3]T. T = transpose

covariance vector

3 2 1
2 2 1
1 1 1


Define the new variables
y1 = z1 + 2z3; y2 = z1 + z2 - z3; y3 = 2z1 + z2 + z3 - 7
(a) Find the mean vector and the covariance matrix of (y1; y2; y3).
(b) Find the mean and variance of
y =(y1 + y2 + y3)/3

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i assume you are talking about multivariate guassian distributed random variables, see below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_normal_distribution

the means will sum directly, though you'll have to think a bit more about the covariances...

you could either consider each element of the covariance directly or you could write the sum oand try and manipulate it into the normal form
 
"she hasnt gone over mean vector and she expects up to solve this"

I'm skeptical of that comment.

You can write the new vector (y_1, y_2, y_3)' as a linear transformation of the original variables, then apply the same transformation to the original mean vector.
There are general rules for transforming a covariance matrix (not covariance vector) from one set of variables to another - more matrix multiplication. The processes do not depend on the assumption of normality.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top