Calculating Molarity of a Solution: Aluminum Salt and Unreacted Sulphuric Acid

  • Thread starter Thread starter zpmodel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molarity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molarity of a solution formed from the reaction of aluminum with sulfuric acid. A user presents a problem involving 2.50 grams of aluminum and 75.0 mL of 24.7% sulfuric acid, seeking help with the calculations. Key steps include determining the moles of sulfuric acid and aluminum, leading to the molarity of the aluminum salt and unreacted sulfuric acid. The calculated molarity for the aluminum salt is 0.232 M, while the unreacted sulfuric acid has a molarity of 0.326 M. The conversation emphasizes the importance of converting quantities to moles for accurate molarity calculations.
zpmodel
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have problem and can not solve it:

A piece of metallic aluminum weighing 2.50 grams is treated with 75.0 mL of sulphuric acid ( d = 1.18 g/cm3 , 24.7% H2SO4 ). After the metal is dissolved, the solution is diluted to 400mL.

a) Calculate the morality of the solution with respect to the aluminum salt formed.
b) Calculate the morality of the resulting solution with respect to unreacted sulphuric acid.


I made a slight attempt, but got lost after it:

75ml x 1.18g = 88.5g

Xg / 88.5g = .247
Xg = 21.859g of H2SO4


I actually don't even know what I am doing anymore :(
I'm seeking a learning experience so that I can solve other problems as well. Please, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zpmodel said:
I have problem and can not solve it:

A piece of metallic aluminum weighing 2.50 grams is treated with 75.0 mL of sulphuric acid ( d = 1.18 g/cm3 , 24.7% H2SO4 ). After the metal is dissolved, the solution is diluted to 400mL.

a) Calculate the morality of the solution with respect to the aluminum salt formed.
b) Calculate the morality of the resulting solution with respect to unreacted sulphuric acid.


I made a slight attempt, but got lost after it:

75ml x 1.18g = 88.5g

Xg / 88.5g = .247
Xg = 21.859g of H2SO4


I actually don't even know what I am doing anymore :(
I'm seeking a learning experience so that I can solve other problems as well. Please, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Im not sure what the morality of the solution would be...but i may be able to help with the molarity...

You have 75mL of 24.7% H2SO4. 75 X 0.247 = 18.53mL of pure H2SO4. 18.53mL X 1.18g/cm3 (density) gives 21.86g H2SO4 X 1mol / 98.078g (molecular weight of H2SO4) = 0.2229mol of H2SO4

Now we have to determine the #moles of aluminum. Assuming Aluminum is purely elemental aluminum, the molecular weight x weight given is 1 mol / 26.98g X 2.50g Al = 0.09266 mol AL

First thing to do in any problem like this is to convert everything to # of moles.

We have 0.2229mol H2SO4 and 0.09266mol Al

The rest is super easy

for part A. you know the number of moles, and amount of solution (0.400L) so 0.09266mol AL / 0.400L = 0.232M

for part B. The amount of H2SO4 remaining (assuming all Al reacted) is 0.2229-0.09266 = 0.13024mol of unreacted H2SO4. so 0.13024/ 0.400L = 0.326M H2SO4.

Hope that helps (and is correct)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top