Chemistry Calculating moles, ratio, empirical formula

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of moles in 3 grams of magnesium oxide (MgO), the formula used is 3 grams multiplied by the conversion factor of 1 mole per 40.311 grams, resulting in 7.44 x 10^-2 moles. This value represents both the moles of magnesium and oxygen, indicating a 1:1 ratio between them. The empirical formula for magnesium oxide is confirmed to be MgO, as one formula unit consists of one magnesium and one oxygen atom. The atomic weights are 24.312 for magnesium and 15.999 for oxygen, supporting the calculation. Overall, the discussion clarifies the process of determining moles and the empirical formula for MgO.
wellY--3
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
when you have to work out the amount of moles in 3 grams of magnesiun oxide (2 grams are magnesium) would you go 0.3 divided by 40.31?
then the answer is 7.44x10^-3 so that means that's the nuymber of moles of magnesium and also the number of moles of oxygen. So if u had to find the ratio of number of moles of magneium to oxygen it would just be 1:1?

but I'm confused about how you would find the empirical formula of that. Can you help?
P.S the grams are wrong because these were found in a disaster of an experiment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the atomic weights of Magnesium and of Oxygen? 24.312, and 15.999, respectively. The compound of magnesium oxide is MgO. So what is the formula weight of Magnesium oxide? It is 40.311 grams per mole. That is the ratio to use.

You want to know how many moles in 3 grams of MgO?
3 grams MgO * (1 mole MgO)/(40.311 grams MgO) = 7.44*10^(-2) moles.

You must have know most of what you were doing; you were off by one order of magnitude. Are you still confused about any of this?
 
oh yer 7.44*10^(-2) sorry
so if i had to work out the number of moles of Mg and O seperately it is just 7.44*10^(-2) mol?
so the ratio n(Mg0:n(O) would be 1:1?
so then that makes the empirical formula just MgO?
 
wellY--3 still asks:
so the ratio n(Mg0:n(O) would be 1:1?
so then that makes the empirical formula just MgO?
Look at the charge of a Magnesium cation: +2
... and look at the "charge" of Oxygen anion: -2;
They can combine as MgO. Note that as you guessed, 1 formula unit MgO has one unit Oxygen and one unit Magnesium. Yes, the empirical formula is MgO.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top