Calculating Moment of Inertia for Combined Shapes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hayden Leete
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for combined shapes, first determine the moment of inertia for each individual piece about the chosen axis, which in this case is the z-axis or the axis perpendicular to the plane. The parallel axis theorem is necessary for adjusting the moment of inertia when the axis of rotation does not pass through the center of mass. The user initially struggled with the concept but found clarity through further research and discussion. This highlights the importance of understanding both central axes and the application of the parallel axis theorem in rotational inertia calculations. Overall, effective communication and additional research can lead to a better grasp of complex physics topics.
Hayden Leete
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
https://scontent-syd1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfl1/v/t34.0-12/13015003_664975026975127_933044449_n.png?oh=0259712996d9a6dde812f6d8886f56b9&oe=5715CA95
So, it's straight forward enough to calculate the moment of inertia of basic planes with evenly distributed mass, but if I were to say glue the red and green plane together, how would I find the moment of inertia of the blue shape?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hayden Leete said:
how would I find the moment of inertia of the blue shape?
About what axis?

You can find the moment of inertia of each piece about the axis of choice, then just add them. (You'll need the parallel axis theorem.)
 
Doc Al said:
About what axis?

You can find the moment of inertia of each piece about the axis of choice, then just add them. (You'll need the parallel axis theorem.)

probably should have specified, the z axis, or the axis perpendicular to the plane. the axis of choice is the blue COM, and I don't know how to find the moment of inertia of each shape except with central axes (I don't know much in the world of rotational inertia)
 
actually you know what, through more googling and researching stuffs, I've figured it out. I've been trying to find somewhere to explain this to me for a while now, but I didn't know exactly what to search for until your reply, so thanks for that :biggrin:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top