Calculating Moment of Inertia for Rod w/ Weights at Ends

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a rod with weights at each end, the parallel axis theorem is recommended. This theorem allows the consideration of the weights as two cylinders, simplifying the calculation by adding the term mr² for each mass. The approach involves treating the axis of rotation as passing through the center of the rod, which aligns with the calculations derived from cylinder equations. The discussion confirms that this method effectively yields accurate results for the moment of inertia. Understanding these theorems is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
jfrusciante
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
My problem is trying to calculate the moment of inertia for a rod with two weights on the each end (like the type weightlifters lift) turning in a horizontal plane with a wire fixed to the middle of the rod.

How do you calculate this? I suppose it could be seen as two cylinders, one small radius big thickness, one large radius small thickness, but how do i sum these together and how do i calculate this.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moment of inertia

Try using the parallel axis and perpendicular axis theorems.

Parallel axis theorem: The moment of inertia (MoI) of a body about any axis parallel to an axis passing through its center of mass (CoM) is equal to the sum of the MoI about the CoM and its mass*(the distance between the two axes ).

Perpendicular axis theorem. The sum of MoI's of a plane body about two perpendicular axes through its plane is equal to the MoI of the body about an axis perpendicular to the plane and passing through the point of intersection of the two previous axes.

tell me if that helps.

spacetime
http://www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
Yes it does spacetime, the parallel axis theorem seems to be what i required because it appears to allow me to just regard the masses as two cylinders with the axis of rotation through their centres. This allows me to simply add mr^2 to the equation for a cylinder, (i think). That also works damn well with the results i have picked up from my investigation.

Thanks for your help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top