Calculating Motional EMF when v not perpendicular to B

AI Thread Summary
To calculate motional EMF when the velocity is not perpendicular to the magnetic field, the general equation ε = ∮ (v x B) · dl is applicable. The term dl represents a small segment of the wire, allowing for the calculation of the force component along the wire. The first equation, ε = vBL, is only valid when the velocity and magnetic field are perpendicular. Understanding the vector cross product v x B is crucial, as it gives the magnetic force vector. This approach provides a comprehensive method for determining EMF in more complex scenarios.
vaizard
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to figure out how you can calculate motional EMF when the velocity of the object in question is not perpendicular to the magnetic field. There are two equations in my textbook, but the text describing them is not very helpful.

The first is \varepsilon = vBL, which can be used when B\perp v and B\perp L. The second is \varepsilon = \oint (\vec v \times \vec B) \cdot d\vec l which is the general form. The first one won't work if they're not perpendicular, and I don't understand what the d\vec l is for in the second one. Could someone explain that to me?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vaizard said:
… I don't understand what the d\vec l is for in the second one. Could someone explain that to me?

Hi vaizard! :smile:

v x B is the magnetic force vector

dl is a short length of the wire

the force won't necessarily be along the wire, so (v x B).dl is the component of force along the wire :wink:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top