Calculating number of character combinations in password

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMinWisconsin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of valid 8-character passwords under specific rules. Initially, the password could consist of 8 alphanumeric characters, leading to over 2 trillion combinations. However, new rules require at least one alphabetic character, one numeric character, and one special character, complicating the calculation. The Inclusion-Exclusion Principle is applied to account for the restrictions, ultimately determining that the total number of valid passwords is approximately 1.5 trillion. This thorough analysis highlights the complexity of password combination calculations under varying constraints.
DMinWisconsin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First of all, I'm not strong in math, but always interested in learning more. This is an "intellectual satisfaction" type of question, meaning knowing the answer won't really impact anything, but will afford me a certain satisfaction by quenching my curiosity. Maybe someone out there would be willing to help me work through how to compute the possible combinations of a password?

The company I work for has a system that historically utilized passwords of 8 (and exactly 8, no more, no less) alphanumeric characters. The only rule was that the first character could not be numeric; otherwise, repeated characters were okay. The password is not case sensitive. So there are 26 possibilities for the first character, and positions 2 - 8 can be any of 36 possibilities. In my mind, then, the number of password possibilities is expressed as 26x36x36x36x36x36x36x36. The result is 2+ trillion; 2,037,468,266,496 to be exact.

The rules were recently changed so that the 8-character password must now contain at least one alphabetic character and one numeric character, as well as one of three special characters (#,!,~). The special character must be used in positions 2 - 7 only, not in the first or last position.

My gut told me the total number of password possibilities had been reduced, because though the overall character base was increased from 36 to 39, two (the first and last) are still base 36, at least one of the characters is base 26, at least one is base 10, and at least one is only base 3. Maybe my gut was wrong though, because of the "at least" part of the scenario. Do the new rules have any mathematical limiting impact on the possibilities for the middle six characters? Is 36x39x39x39x39x39x39x36 = 4,560,291,914,256 the right answer? I have a feeling I'm overlooking something, and I'd appreciate someone giving me some clarity on this. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yeah, the calculation is more complicated than that. Because your calculation says that
12345678 ,for example, is a possible password. But there must be at least a number, at least an alphabet and at least one of the 3 symbols you mentioned above.
 
You can picture it this way: first the new rules increase the number of possible passwords to the amount you calculated. But they then decrease the amount of possible passwords by requiring at least one position to be filled by a symbol, at least one position to be a number, and at least one position to be a letter. It is tedious to count the condition "at least". What we can do instead is subtract the three types of passwords that are not allowed: passwords that do not contain any symbols, passwords that do not contain any numbers and passwords that do not contain any letters. We want to subtract the union of these three sets, so we must take care to account for their intersections (for example, when we subtract each set separately we subtract "passwords that contain neither numbers nor letters" twice: once when we subtract passwords with no numbers and again when we subtract passwords with no letters. We must add back this amount, since the second subtraction is erroneous: that amount was already subtracted). This method of counting is usually referred to as the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle.
So we have "No Numbers" as (26^2)(29^6). What that means is we have only letters in the first and last positions and a choice of only letters or symbols for positions 2-7. Similarly, "No Letters" is (10^2)(13^6) and "No Symbols" is 36^8. The 3 double intersections that are over-counted are "No Numbers or letters": 0 because our full set only contains passwords that require letters or numerals in the first and last position, "No Numbers or symbols": 26^8, and "No letters or symbols": 10^8. The triple intersection: passwords that contain no letters, no symbols and no numbers is empty.
So our final count would be the full set of "8-character passwords containing only alphanumeric characters in the 1st and last positions and including symbols as an option in positions 2-7", subtract the single missing categories, and add back the over-counted intersections: (36^2)(39^6) - (26^2)(29^6) - (10^2)(13^6) - 36^8 + 26^8 + 10^8 = 1,545,525,825,480. According to Wolfram Alpha, that's about 5 times the amount of stars in our galaxy, which is a cute tidbit to know. =D
 
Last edited:
I think we can formulize your solution as follows:

Let n(A) : # of passwords without any number, n(B): # of passwords without any letter, n(C): # of passwords without any symbol, n(S): # of passwords in the full set.

Then, we calculate n(S)-n(A\cup B\cup C), where n(A\cup B\cup C)=n(A)+n(B)+n(C)-n(A\cap B)-n(A\cap C)-n(B\cap C)+n(A\cap B\cap C) to find the answer.
 
Thanks to each of you.

Slider, your well-written explanation is exactly what I was looking for. I followed the thought process and it makes sense to me now. I appreciate your time.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top