Calculating Object Density with Formulae

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haftred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Formulae
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct formulas for calculating the density of an object using Archimedes' principle. Two proposed formulas are evaluated, both of which are confirmed to be valid for determining density. The conversation emphasizes that buoyant forces can complicate calculations, suggesting a simpler approach of using the mass of the object and the volume of displaced fluid. It is noted that Archimedes' law applies primarily to incompressible fluids, allowing for straightforward density calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that the density can be easily derived from the object's mass and the volume of fluid it displaces.
Haftred
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Can I use either of these formulae to find the desity of an object?

a) ((Weightapparent/Forcebuoyant) + 1)(Densityfluid) = Densityobj

b) (Weightobject/Forcebuoyant *Densityfluid) = Densityobj

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Archimedes law tells you the buoyance force is equal to the gravitational force on the displaced mass:

F_{buoyance}=g \rho_{fluid} V_{displaced}

The apparent weight of the object can be found by evaluating the net downward force F_g-F_{buoyance}=g[m-\rho_{fluid} V_{displaced}] Where the term between brackets is the apparent weight.

With \rho density, m mass V volume and g the gravitational acceleration. With this knowledge you can probably work out the answer yourself!
 
I still can't figure it out :mad:
 
da_willem said:
Archimedes law tells you the buoyance force is equal to the gravitational force on the displaced mass:

F_{buoyance}=g \rho_{fluid} V_{displaced}

The apparent weight of the object can be found by evaluating the net downward force F_g-F_{buoyance}=g[m-\rho_{fluid} V_{displaced}] Where the term between brackets is the apparent weight.

With \rho density, m mass V volume and g the gravitational acceleration. With this knowledge you can probably work out the answer yourself!

What's to figure out than applying what Da-willem said??

You may want to write:
\rho_{body}-\rho_{fluid}=\frac{F_g-F_{buoyance}}{g V_{displaced}}
From the previous equation,the density of the body is immediate.
 
ok, so my original two formulas are correct then, right?
 
Haftred said:
ok, so my original two formulas are correct then, right?

Yes,they are true.But why complicate with calculating buoyant forces,when u can simply say that:
\rho_{object}=\frac{m_{object}}{V_{displaced}}
It's Archimede's law that states that,if the fluid is incompressible (Archimedes didn't think of compressible fluids),then the volume of the body is equal to the volume of the displaced fluid.Since u can easily determine one's body mass,the density is immediate.

Daniel.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top