Calculating Orbital Velocity Ratios for Planets A and B

AI Thread Summary
Planet A and Planet B are in circular orbits around a star, with Planet A being 8.5 times farther from the star than Planet B. The initial approach to calculate their velocity ratio using the force equation F=1/r^2 is incorrect, as it does not account for the relationship between velocity and radius in circular motion. The correct method indicates that the square of the orbital velocity is inversely proportional to the radius of the orbit. Therefore, the velocity ratio Va/Vb can be calculated as the square root of the inverse of their distance ratio, resulting in Va/Vb = Sqrt(1/8.5), which equals approximately 0.35. This highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of circular orbits in gravitational fields.
mariners02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Planet A and planet B are in circular orbits around a distant star. Planet A is 8.5 times farther from the star than is planet B. What is the ratio of their speeds Va/Vb

This problem seems very simple, thought i could just use F=1/r^2, find the difference in forces, which would also be the difference in velocity. Can anyone explain the error in my thinking?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mariners02 said:
Planet A and planet B are in circular orbits around a distant star. Planet A is 8.5 times farther from the star than is planet B. What is the ratio of their speeds Va/Vb

This problem seems very simple, thought i could just use F=1/r^2, find the difference in forces, which would also be the difference in velocity. Can anyone explain the error in my thinking?

The problem is that the force is proportional to the velocity squared divided by the radius. Thus the velocity squared is proportional to the inverse of the radius.
 
So i could just do V=Sqrt(1/8.5)=.35?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top