Calculating Potential Difference in Self-Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haru Yo Koi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference across a coil with a resistance of 3.65 Ω and an inductance of 410 mH, given a current of 3.94 A increasing at 3.31 A/s. The initial calculations yield a voltage of 14.381 V and an induced emf of 1.3571 V. It is clarified that while Lenz's Law indicates the induced emf opposes the change in current, the overall potential difference is the sum of the IR drop and the induced emf. Therefore, the correct total potential difference is 15.7 V, as the induced emf adds to the IR drop when the current is increasing. This highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between resistance and inductance in circuits.
Haru Yo Koi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A coil has 3.65 \Omega resistance and 410 mH inductance.
If the current is 3.94 A and is increasing at a rate of 3.31 A/s, what is the potential difference across the coil at this moment?

Homework Equations



V = IR
Induced emf = -L * dI/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


It is easy to calculate that V = 14.381, induced = 1.3571.

But since it is an increasing current, it seems like lenz's law should imply that the induced emf opposes V, i.e. Voverall = V - induced.

But the correct answer is that Voverall = V + induced = 15.7 V, and I don't understand why that is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone explain this?I think the reason for this is that V is the sum of two parts: the IR drop, and the induced emf. Since V = IR and the IR drop is always in the same direction as the current, the IR drop will have the same sign as the current. The induced emf, however, is always in the opposite direction as the current (due to Lenz's Law). So, when the current is increasing, the induced emf will be positive and will add to the IR drop.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top