Calculating Potential Energy of Three Point Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy of three point charges using the formula PE=k(q1q2/r + q1q3/r + q2q3/r), where k is 8.99e9. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct distance "r" for each pair of charges and converting charge values to standard units (e.g., 2.9 microCoulombs to 2.9e-6 C). There is a mention of a mistake regarding the sign of the potential energy, which was initially calculated incorrectly. Clarifications are provided to ensure proper understanding of the calculations. The conversation highlights the need for attention to detail in physics problems involving multiple charges.
disque
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three point charges Q1 = 2.9 mu or micro C, Q2 = 4.9 mu or micro C and Q3 = 3.9 mu or micro C, are arranged as shown.

Homework Equations



PE=k(q1q2/r+q1q3/r+q2q3/r)
k=8.99e9

The Attempt at a Solution



By using that equation I plugged in the lengths and changed the 2.9 to micro coulombs.
 

Attachments

  • 18prob09.jpg
    18prob09.jpg
    10.3 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
disque said:

Homework Equations



PE=k(q1q2/r+q1q3/r+q2q3/r)
k=8.99e9

The Attempt at a Solution



By using that equation I plugged in the lengths...
Sounds like you have the right idea. You realize that "r" is different for each pair of charges, right?

... and changed the 2.9 to micro coulombs.
I'm not sure what that means. Just use 2.9e-6 C, etc., for the charge values.
 
yea i got it, i had a negative sign and it was positive. not really sure why but thanks for your help
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

What Am I Doing Wrong in Calculating Potential on a Grid?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Electric Potential Energy of Point Charge Systems
Replies
2
Views
885
Electromagnetism problem: Merging of 2 charged drops of mercury
Replies
2
Views
1K
Kinetic and potential energy of a particle attracted by charged sphere
Replies
6
Views
1K
Potential energy of a System of charges
Replies
5
Views
1K
A charge q approaching two stationary charges q1 and q2
Replies
7
Views
882
Potential energy of an arrangement of point charges
Replies
1
Views
10K
Three point charge in a plane (electricity in physics II)
Replies
3
Views
10K
Potential energy due to an external charge and a grounded sphere
Replies
8
Views
2K
Potential Energy of three charged particles
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top