MHB Calculating Powers of 4: A Challenge!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wilmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around determining if the expression 4^27 + 4^500 + 4^972 is a perfect square. A manageable example is provided, showing that 4^3 + 4^7 + 4^10 equals 1032^2, illustrating the method of factoring. The original problem is reformulated, leading to the conclusion that n must equal 972 after applying the derived formula n = 2v - u - 1. The calculations demonstrate how to manipulate large integers to confirm the square property, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationships between the exponents. The thread concludes with clarity on the transition from n-27 to 945, reinforcing the solution's correctness.
Wilmer
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Working with a problem with huge integers;
is 4^27 + 4^500 + 4^972 a square? (length of that is 586 digits!)

Manageable(!) example:
4^3 + 4^7 + 4^10 = 1032^2

Thanks for any help; couldn't find an online calculator that can handle that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I do not know if this work for you to make sure it is an integer I took the floor of the square root here
check this
and this

to make sure it is an integer I took the floor of the square root here
 
Last edited:
Wilmer said:
Working with a problem with huge integers;
is 4^27 + 4^500 + 4^972 a square? (length of that is 586 digits!)

Manageable(!) example:
4^3 + 4^7 + 4^10 = 1032^2

Thanks for any help; couldn't find an online calculator that can handle that.
For the manageable example
$$4^3 + 4^7 + 4^{10} = 4^3(1 + 4^4 + 4^7) = 2^6(1 + 2^8 + 2^{14}) = \bigl(2^3(1+2^7)\bigr)^2.$$
Now try the same procedure with your bigger numbers.
 
Thanks loads, Amer.
I'll make SURE to remember Wolfram!

This was the original problem:
4^27 + 4^500 + 4^n = k^2
where n and k are both positive integers.
What is n?

This was the given solution:
4^27 + 4^500 + 4^n
= 4^27 (1 + 2^946 + 4^(n - 27))
= 4^27 (1 + 2.2^945 + (2^(n-27))^2)
= 4^27 (1 + 2.2^945 + (2^945)^2) ***********
= ((2^27)(1 + 2^945))^2
= k^2 where k = (2^27)(1 + 2^945)

so it must indicate n - 27 = 945
it means n = 27 + 945 = 972

I can follow almost all of it; except the switch from n-27 to 945 ***********
Can you see why? Thanks.
 
Thanks Opal; now quite clear. Slightly differently:

4^27 + 4^500 + 4^n

= 2^54 + 2^1000 + 2^(2n)

= 2^54[1 + 2^946 + 2^(2n - 54)] : A

= 2^54[1 + 2^(n - 27)]^2

= 2^54[1 + 2^(n - 26) + 2^(2n - 54)] : B

A, B: 2^54[1 + 2^946 + 2^(2n - 54)] = 2^54[1 + 2^(n - 26) + 2^(2n - 54)]
So:
2^946 = 2^(n - 26)
n - 26 = 946
n = 972

In other words, using 4^u + 4^v + 4^n :
n = 2v - u - 1
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top