Calculating probability distribution for rolling 4 dice plus reroll lowest die

Paraxis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to figure out what the probability distribution is for the following:

1. Roll 4 dice.
2. Take the lowest die and re-roll it.
3. Take the sum of the three highest dice.

The result will be between 3 and 18.

I know how to figure out the probability distribution for rolling 4 dice and taking the three highest, but how can we calculate the distribution when re-rolling the lowest die?

My thought process goes as follows:
When you roll the 4 dice and keep the three highest, the result from re-rolling the lowest remaining die is only kept if the roll is higher than any of the three dice that were kept.

e.g.

Say you roll a 6,4,2 and 1. Keep the 6,4 and 2 and re-roll the 1.
The new roll is only kept if and only if it exceeds 2.
Therefore there is a 2 in 6 probability for the sum to be 12 and there is a 1 in 6 probability for the sum to be each of 13, 14, 15 or 16.

I can calculate this long hand by writing up all 1296 possible combinations for 4 dice, but if you could supply me with a formula, it would be much quicker...

Thanks,

Paraxis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Paraxis! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Paraxis said:
1. Roll 4 dice.
2. Take the lowest die and re-roll it.
3. Take the sum of the three highest dice.

Isn't that the same as
1. Roll 5 dice.
2. Take the sum of the three highest dice?​
 


tiny-tim said:
Isn't that the same as
1. Roll 5 dice.
2. Take the sum of the three highest dice?​

...

I've racked my brain and can't see how it is NOT!

Wow... Just roll 5 dice... I guess I over-thought things!

Unless someone demonstrates that it is not the same as rolling 5 dice...

Thanks! Much MUCH easier to calculate...

So the distribution is:

3 = 1 (0.01%)
4 = 5 (0.06%)
5 = 15 (0.17%)
6 = 41 (0.45%)
7 = 90 (0.99%)
8 = 171 (1.88%)
9 = 300 (3.31%)
10 = 485 (5.35%)
11 = 697 (7.68%)
12 = 946 (10.43%)
13 = 1163 (12.82%)
14 = 1326 (14.62%)
15 = 1335 (14.72%)
16 = 1196 (13.18%)
17 = 854 (9.41%)
18 = 447 (4.93%)
 
Paraxis said:
Wow... Just roll 5 dice... I guess I over-thought things!

he he :biggrin:
 


Paraxis said:
So the distribution is:

3 = 1 (0.01%)
4 = 5 (0.06%)
5 = 15 (0.17%)
6 = 41 (0.45%)
7 = 90 (0.99%)
8 = 171 (1.88%)
9 = 300 (3.31%)
10 = 485 (5.35%)
11 = 697 (7.68%)
12 = 946 (10.43%)
13 = 1163 (12.82%)
14 = 1326 (14.62%)
15 = 1335 (14.72%)
16 = 1196 (13.18%)
17 = 854 (9.41%)
18 = 447 (4.93%)

That totals 9072 permutations but 65 = 7776

I make the correct frequencies 1, 5, 15, 41, 90, 170, 296, 470, 665, 881, 1055, 1155, 1111, 935, 610, 276
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top