Calculating Probability & Expected Wins in Betting Game

  • Thread starter Thread starter xChee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
xChee
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In a betting game a player gets to 3 chances to play after betting 6 dollars. The player must roll a 4 on a die. If he doesn't he loses. If he does then he can advance to the next round where he can then draw 3 cards from a deck of 8 consisting of 2 kings, two queens, two jacks and 2 jokers. If he draws the 2 jokers then he wins the game (does't matter what the third card is). The prize for winning the game is 30 dollars plus the 6 he originally used to play the game. So in total 36 dollars.

a) what's the probability of rolling a 4?

is it 1/6?

b) what's the probability of drawing 2 jokers?

is it (2C2)(6C1)/(8C2)

which is, 6/28

c) what is the probability of winning?

is it
(1/6)(6/28)
which is 1/28 ?

d) What is the expected value of one bet?

is it

E(x)= ( ∑ xi)(P(x))=((-6.00)(27/28))((30.00)(1/28))
= -1215/196 dollars?

e) Calculate his expected number of wins in those 3 trails

is it (3)(1/28) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xChee said:
Is it (2C2)(6C1)/(8C2)
(2C2)(6C1)/(8C3) = 3/28

d) What is the expected value of one bet?

is it

E(x)= ( ∑ xi)(P(x))=((-6.00)(27/28))((30.00)(1/28))
= -1215/196 dollars?
You have turned a sum into a product.
E(x)= ∑ xi P(xi)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top