Calculating Radioactive Au(A=198) and Hg(A=198) After 5 Days of Bombardment

  • Thread starter Thread starter shahar weiss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
shahar weiss
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Here's a ques. I am having problem with:
sample of gold is bombard with 2*10^10 neutrons per sec. it cause the Au(A=197) become radioactive (Au(A=198)) which decay with half life time of 2.969day (through beta decay
1. how many Au(A=198) will be after 5 days of bombardment?
2. how many Hg(A=198) will there be after 5 days?
3. what is the number of radioactive Au(A=198) at equilibrium and what will be the activity of the sample?

im having problem getting the differential equations right here, ill be very happy for any help. thank you so much in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried with
feb02fefd0777f96a831adf4965e92d2.png
?R.
 
Welcome to physics forums.

shahar weiss said:
Here's a ques. I am having problem with:
sample of gold is bombard with 2*10^10 neutrons per sec. it cause the Au(A=197) become radioactive (Au(A=198)) which decay with half life time of 2.969day (through beta decay
1. how many Au(A=198) will be after 5 days of bombardment?
2. how many Hg(A=198) will there be after 5 days?
3. what is the number of radioactive Au(A=198) at equilibrium and what will be the activity of the sample?

im having problem getting the differential equations right here, ill be very happy for any help. thank you so much in advance

Okay, there are two things to think about here concerning the Au-198:
  • At what rate are Au-198 atoms created?
  • At what rate are Au-198 atoms destroyed (i.e they decay)?
Those two rates determine what \frac{dN}{dt} is for Au-198.
 
Rick88 said:
Have you tried with
feb02fefd0777f96a831adf4965e92d2.png
?


R.

wont work here since there are two different half life times, two different activities, two different decay constants.
your formula is good when there is simple decay from some amount of radiactive sample.
here the sample's size changing all the time
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top