Calculating Reaction Forces in Truss Structures

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating reaction forces in truss structures, focusing on the application of static equilibrium principles and the geometry of the truss. Participants are seeking assistance with a specific truss problem involving forces and angles, as well as the methodology for determining moments and components of forces.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in completing their analysis of a truss problem, particularly in determining the x and y distances for a 500N force and how to proceed with calculating moments.
  • Another participant suggests using the Law of Cosines to solve for angles in the isosceles triangles formed in the truss structure.
  • A participant indicates that the 500N force is likely a vertical gravity load, which complicates the analysis of its components depending on the chosen coordinate system.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of aligning coordinates with the forces at point A and the implications of changing the axis for calculations.
  • One participant mentions the importance of using static equilibrium equations to find reactions at points A and G, emphasizing that the structure cannot sustain a moment at point A.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the analysis and the need to find angles for the forces at A, which are not directly aligned with the x and y axes.
  • Another participant reassures that the coordinate system can be adjusted for convenience, suggesting that the positive x-axis can run along a specific line in the truss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on how to approach the problem, with no clear consensus on the best method for calculating the reaction forces or the necessity of changing the coordinate system. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to seek clarification and assistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for specific angles and side lengths to resolve the problem, indicating potential limitations in the provided information and assumptions about the geometry of the truss.

hc23881
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
http://[ATTACH=full]199940[/ATTACH] I am having trouble with this truss problem. I have attached my work so far. I used the entire structure as a system first and did the sum of the forces equals zero but I don't know how I can finish the moment at a because I don't know the x and y distances for the 500N force. and I have no idea where to go from there and have been working on it for a long time. I get so lost with the angles in problems like these. help would be appreciated. thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20151016_171144303.jpg
    IMG_20151016_171144303.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 500
  • IMG_20151016_171028175.jpg
    IMG_20151016_171028175.jpg
    13.2 KB · Views: 478
  • PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    18 KB · Views: 229
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hc23881 said:
http://[ATTACH=full]199941[/ATTACH] I am having trouble with this truss problem. I have attached my work so far. I used the entire structure as a system first and did the sum of the forces equals zero but I don't know how I can finish the moment at a because I don't know the x and y distances for the 500N force. and I have no idea where to go from there and have been working on it for a long time. I get so lost with the angles in problems like these. help would be appreciated. thanks![/QUOTE]
You have to pick a triangle and work out the angles.

The triangles ABF, BFD, BDC, and FED are all the same: isosceles triangles with a base length of 400 cm and identical sides of 250 cm.

Triangle AGF is an oddball, but it still can be solved. Remember the Law of Cosines?

[CENTER][ATTACH=full]199942[/ATTACH] [/CENTER]
 

Attachments

  • PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    18 KB · Views: 235
  • lcos.gif
    lcos.gif
    3 KB · Views: 247
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks, but I am still stuck. So I have figured out all the angles(picture attached) but I still can't figure it out. if i make my coordinates line up with Ax and Ay what degrees I would use for the x and y component of the 500N force. (when I am taking the moments about A and the sum of the x and y forces of the big triangle as the system. or is this not necessary and can i start at some other triangle to get the answer?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20151016_194516762.jpg
    IMG_20151016_194516762.jpg
    34.7 KB · Views: 517
hc23881 said:
thanks, but I am still stuck. So I have figured out all the angles(picture attached) but I still can't figure it out. if i make my coordinates line up with Ax and Ay what degrees I would use for the x and y component of the 500N force. (when I am taking the moments about A and the sum of the x and y forces of the big triangle as the system. or is this not necessary and can i start at some other triangle to get the answer?
It looks to me like the 500 N force is a gravity load, like something suspended from this truss. The 500 N has only a vertical component.
 
SteamKing said:
It looks to me like the 500 N force is a gravity load, like something suspended from this truss. The 500 N has only a vertical component.
even if i change the axis? then it wouldn't be only in the y direction.. but if i keep the axis as shown in the picture i don't know the angle to use for Ay because it cuts the triangle in a way where i don't know the side lengths and therefore can't find the angle
 
hc23881 said:
even if i change the axis? then it wouldn't be only in the y direction.. but if i keep the axis as shown in the picture i don't know the angle to use for Ay because it cuts the triangle in a way where i don't know the side lengths and therefore can't find the angle
You've lost me, here, and I think you are making this analysis more complicated than it needs to be.

From the picture, it looks like A is a pinned connection, and you can assume the center of the pin and point A and the vertex of the triangles sharing that point all coincide.

Why would you want to change the axis? To create even more calculation work?

You can use the equations of static equilibrium to find the reactions at A and G due to the load at E. The structure can rotate about point A, thus it can't sustain a moment at that location. You'll need a force at G to keep the structure from rotating about A.
 
but when i have the x and y components of the forces at A. they arnt directly on the x and y-axis given , therefore i have to find both the x and y components of those forces. that is what i am having trouble with..
 
hc23881 said:
but when i have the x and y components of the forces at A. they arnt directly on the x and y-axis given , therefore i have to find both the x and y components of those forces. that is what i am having trouble with..
The x-y axis shown on the diagram is just there as a reminder.

You can make the origin of your coordinate axis at a convenient location, say point A. The positive x-axis can be taken running along the line AFE, and the positive y-axis only needs to start at A and be perpendicular to the x-axis. It won't matter as far as calculating the reaction forces which keep the truss in equilibrium are concerned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
830
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K