Calculating Refraction at a Spherical Surface with Multiple Media

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the image position formed by a spherical surface separating two media with different refractive indices. The initial setup involves a radius of curvature of 10 cm, with a luminous point object located 144 cm away in a medium with a refractive index of 1.1. The participant attempts to apply the refraction formula but arrives at a value not listed in the options, leading to confusion about the correct reference refractive index. There is a suggestion to consider the apparent position of the object or the refracting surface from different perspectives to clarify the calculations. The conversation highlights the complexity of refraction at a spherical surface and the importance of accurately determining the reference point for calculations.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radius of curvature of spherical surface is 10 cm. The spherical surface separates two media of refractive indices 1.1 and 1.3 as shown in Figure. The medium of refractive index 1.3 extends upto 78 cm from the spherical surface. A luminous point object O is at the distance of 144 cm from the spherical surface in the medium of refractive index 1.1. The image formed by the spherical surface is at

1)900 cm from O
2)900 cm from A in medium μ3
3)900/7 cm from O
4)900/7 cm from A in medium μ3

attachment.php?attachmentid=34917&stc=1&d=1303825793.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



The first two mediums act as glass slabs of thickness 66cm and 78cm resp.
Shift produced due to them = 24cm
New distance of the object from the spherical surface = 144-24=120cm

Using the formula of refraction at a spherical surface,

1.5/v + 1/120 = 0.5/10 (I kept μ as 1, may be I am wrong here)

I got v=36cm from O which is not in the options.
 

Attachments

  • d23a1fe8-9028-41dc-8f20-7dff5e1211d0.jpg
    d23a1fe8-9028-41dc-8f20-7dff5e1211d0.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org


Hey.
I'm not sure about anything,
but I don't find the normal shift you consider alright.(you consider '1' as the reference refractive index which is nowhere)
According to me,you must make an observer stand near the refracting surface(in the medium 1.3) and
find the apparent position of the object from there.
or...
make an observer stand near the object(in the medium 1.1) and find the app position of the refracting surface.
I am confused which...

Am I right?sorry if not
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Back
Top