Calculating Rocket Speed at a Distant Location

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
AI Thread Summary
A rocket launched at 15,000 m/s will have a speed of approximately 9,988 m/s when it is very far from Earth, calculated using conservation of energy principles. The potential energy decreases as the rocket ascends because it approaches zero at infinite distance, indicating an increase in energy. The discussion clarifies that while gravitational potential energy is negative, it increases as the rocket moves away from Earth. The calculations and concepts presented are confirmed to be correct. Understanding the relationship between height and potential energy is crucial in this context.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket is launched straight up from the Earth's surface at a speed of 15,000 m/s. What is its speed when it is very far away from earth?


Homework Equations


K=.5mv^2
U=-GMm/R


The Attempt at a Solution


Is this correct: I used conservation of energy and assumed very far was where U=0

(.5)(m)(15000m/s)^2 + -[(6.67*10^-11)(5.98*10^24)m]/[6.37*10^6m)=.5mv^2
v=9988 m/s

Also could someone explain to me why potential energy decreases with increasing height in this case as opposed to increasing U by lifting an object above the ground on earth.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks okay to me.


bcjochim07 said:
Also could someone explain to me why potential energy decreases with increasing height in this case as opposed to increasing U by lifting an object above the ground on earth.

It doesn't; the potential energy is a negative number that get closer to zero with increasing height (i.e., distance away from the earth), which means it is increasing.
 
Oh yeah. I see exactly what you are saying. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top