Calculating Rope Tension & Foot Force for Mountain Climber

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvolpe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a rope and the contact force exerted by a wall on a mountain climber. The climber's weight and the distances from the center of gravity to the wall and buckle are crucial for determining these forces. The importance of the center of gravity is highlighted, as it affects the moments and reaction forces at the climber's feet. Participants emphasize the need to treat x and y components of forces correctly when calculating torques. The final calculations yield a rope tension of 572.8 N and a wall force direction of 21.2 degrees.
dvolpe
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mountain climber is rappelling down a vertical wall. The rope attaches to a buckle strapped to the climber's waist 15 cm to the right of his center of gravity and makes an angle of θ = 23° with the wall. The climber weighs 616 N. The distance from his center of gravity to the wall is 91 cm and the distance from his feet on the wall to the buckle is 106 cm
(a) Find the tension in the rope
(b) Find the magnitude and direction of the contact force exerted by the wall on the climber's feet.

Homework Equations


F = ma
g = 9.8
Weight of climber = 616 N = vertical force of ropes tension plus force against feet
Vertical component of rope tension force = total tension cos 23 degrees
Force on feet = ?

The Attempt at a Solution



616 N = F total * .921 + ?

I am having real difficulty with this as I don't understand the importance of the center of gravity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi dvolpe! welcome to pf! :wink:
dvolpe said:
I am having real difficulty with this as I don't understand the importance of the center of gravity.

the importance is that the the weight of the climber acts through the centre of gravity (the centre of mass) …

when you take moments, the further out the centre of gravity is, the larger the moment (of the weight) will be, and that will change the reaction force at the climber's feet :smile:
 
So the sum of the y components of the rope tension, wall force, weight of the climber = 0. The x component of the wall force equals the x component of the tension. Using the buckle as a axis, the sum of the torques equals 0 in the y direction or the y force of wall times .106 m = weight times .091. Force of wall in y direction is 87.17 N. Then substituting in back into first sentence and tension of rope = 572.8 N. The wall force is equal to the square root of the sum of its x and y components. Already have the y component; x component = force of tension in x direction or T cos theta. Solve for wall force. The direction of the wall force is solved by trig: sin theta = y comp/total wall force or theta = 21.2 degrees. Does this approach seem correct? I am concerned about using the correct distances in the sum of torques equation.
 
Last edited:
hi dvolpe! :smile:
dvolpe said:
… the sum of the torques equals 0 in the y direction …

are you treating the x and y directions separately for moments (torques)?

you can't do that!

a vertical force of strength F at perpendicular distance d has the same moment (torque) as a horizontal force of strength F at perpendicular distance d (so long as they're both clockwise or both anti-clockwise)

more generally, what is important is the direction of the moment … d x F is out of the page, and therefore has to be added to all other moments that are out of the page :smile:

start again (and, for taking moments, it's easiest if you choose a point which eliminates as many unknowns as possible :wink:)​
 
Ok..what I meant to say is that I selected the point of the buckle to take the moment as the forces in the y direction are perpendicular to the point but the forces in the x direction are not and therefore do not contribute to the moment at the buckle. That point gives me the least unknowns. I solved it as I indicated above..is this correct? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
dvolpe said:
Ok..what I meant to say is that I selected the point of the buckle to take the moment as the forces in the y direction are perpendicular to the point but the forces in the x direction are not and therefore do not contribute to the moment at the buckle.

no, at the climber's feet, both the x and y components of the reaction force have a moment about the buckle

(btw it occurs to me that since there are only three forces on the climber, they must all go through the same point, which instantly gives you the direction of that reaction force :wink:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top