Calculating Rotational Inertia: Hoops vs. Solid Cylinders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating rotational inertia for hoops versus solid cylinders, specifically addressing the moment of inertia formula, I = MR^2. Participants clarify that a "disc" refers to a solid cylinder, and emphasize the importance of converting RPM to radians per second for accurate calculations. There is a concern about the calculated energy value of 1.4 x 10^6 Js, which seems low, prompting a review of unit conversions. The conversation highlights the necessity of sanity checks on answers to ensure correctness. Overall, accurate unit conversion and understanding of the physical concepts are crucial for solving the problem.
goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Cd9E26L.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume the energy stored is = 1/2 (I) (ω^2)

I (moment of inertia) is MR^2 since it's a hoop? or is it a solid cylinder?

do we need to convert the rpm (revolutions per minute) to radians per sec?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, just realize that a disc is a cylinder with vanishing height.

Otherwise yeah, try it out and report back on what you end up with. It'll be important to do a sanity check on the answer that you get - that'll tell you whether you got the right answer or not most of the time.
 
MaxwellsCat said:
You're on the right track, just realize that a disc is a cylinder with vanishing height.

No, that's a thin disk. A disk is a solid cylinder.

goonking said:
do we need to convert the rpm (revolutions per minute) to radians per sec?

As you defined it, ω is angular velocity, which is typically measured in radians per second.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I should have been explicit - I meant a solid cylinder.
 
after doing all the math, answer came out to be 1.4 x 10^6 Js.
 
So right away there's something wrong - the units should be J not J##\cdot##s, unless you meant Joules :P

Does that answer make sense? In the context of the problem, does that seem reasonable?
 
MaxwellsCat said:
So right away there's something wrong - the units should be J not J##\cdot##s, unless you meant Joules :P

Does that answer make sense? In the context of the problem, does that seem reasonable?
yes, i meant joules.
 
goonking said:
after doing all the math, answer came out to be 1.4 x 10^6 Js.
Seems too low. Check your conversion from revolutions to radians.
 
Back
Top