MHB Calculating Sand Volume for a Cylindrical Containment Vessel

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the sand volume required for a cylindrical containment vessel enclosing a spherical pressure vessel, first determine the volume of the cylinder and the sphere. The sphere has a diameter of 10 m, leading to a radius of 5 m, while the cylinder's dimensions must be established based on the sphere's size. The correct approach is to subtract the volume of the sphere from the volume of the cylinder to find the volume of sand needed. This calculation ensures that all space in the cylinder is filled with sand, providing the necessary support for the sphere. Accurate volume calculations are essential for effective containment and safety.
nathan12345
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A spherical pressure vessel with a diamter of 10 m is tightly enclosed in a cylindrical containment vessel with the sphere just touching on all 4 sides . Additional protective material (assume is sand ) is added to the cyclinder to provide additional support .How much sand is required so that all the space in the cylinder is filled ?
I am beginning a new course , and I am pretty new to the topic , but in my head I would calculate the volume of the sphere , and then the cylinder , and subtract the volume of the cylinder from the volume of the sphere ? .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Right... but it's the other way around: subtract the volume of the cylinder from the volume of the sphere...
 
subtract the volume of the sphere from the volume of the cylinder

BA9B4A01-2E3A-40AB-A27A-1E9683FCC772.png
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top