Calculating Satellite Orbit Period: A Misstep

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the orbital period of a satellite with a mass of 85 kg in a circular orbit with a radius of 2.04 x 10^7 m. The formula T^2 = (4π^2/GM)r^3 was correctly identified, but the mass of the satellite should not be used; instead, the mass of the Earth is required for accurate results. The gravitational constant G was noted to be incorrectly referenced, needing the full unit value of 6.67 x 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2. Additionally, ensuring consistent units for radius and gravitational constant is crucial for accurate calculations. Careful verification of all values and units is essential to avoid miscalculations in orbital period.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Consider a satellite, mass=85 kg, in a circular orbit about Earth. Calculate the period of the satellite given a radius r of its orbit of 2.04 x 10^7 m.

I used T^2= (4pi^2/ GM)r^3
Plugging in G= 6.67 x 10^-11
M= 85 kg
r= 2.04 x 10^7 and solving for T gave 7.69 x 10^15 s.
This wasn't right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty sure you use the mass of the earth, not the satelite, since it is what's providing the centripetal acceleration.

http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/circles/u6l4c.html for more info.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


It seems like there may have been a mistake in the calculation. The formula used, T^2= (4pi^2/ GM)r^3, is the correct formula for calculating the orbital period of a satellite. However, the values used for the variables may not have been accurate.

Firstly, the mass of the satellite is given as 85 kg, which is an extremely low mass for a satellite. Most satellites have masses in the range of hundreds to thousands of kilograms. It is possible that this is a typo and the correct mass should have been given as 85,000 kg.

Secondly, the value of G used in the calculation is incorrect. The correct value for the gravitational constant is 6.67 x 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2, not 6.67 x 10^-11 alone. This could have been a simple error in inputting the value into the calculator.

Lastly, it is important to note that the units used for the radius must be consistent with the units for G. In this case, the radius is given in meters, so the value of G should also be in meters. This could also have contributed to the incorrect result.

In order to accurately calculate the orbital period, it is important to double check all values and units before plugging them into the formula. It may also be helpful to use scientific notation to avoid any potential errors in calculation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top